Bill · H.Res. 230· House(119-HRES-230)
Expressing the sense that Congress and the administration must work together, with urgency, to pursue effective food and agricultural trade policies.
- Introduced
- 3/18/2025
- Last activity
- 3/18/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Sponsored by
- Dusty Johnson
- Cosponsors
- - 9 - 10
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution expresses the sense of Congress that the legislative and executive branches must urgently work together on food and agricultural trade policies. It highlights that while the U.S. food and agriculture industries are vital to prosperity and global food security, there has been a 9-percent decline in export value. The resolution notes a predicted $37,000,000,000 trade deficit for the 2024 fiscal year, contrasting with historical surpluses. It aims to address trade-restrictive tariffs and nonscience-based trade barriers. Finally, it calls for renewed efforts to secure market access and maintain global competitiveness.
Yes· 3 of 11
Would farmers be better off under this?+7
The resolution is primarily focused on securing market access and protections for farmers and ranchers.
Does this make trade with other countries easier?+6
The central goal is to improve trade by lowering tariffs and removing non-science-based barriers.
Would business owners be better off under this?+5
The resolution specifically supports agricultural businesses through improved trade access.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Market Access and Competitiveness: The resolution calls for a renewed commitment to secure new and expanded market access, which could benefit the U.S. food and agriculture industries (Section 1).
-
Support for Agricultural Sectors: There is a call for strong support for domestic trade promotion programs designed to benefit all sectors of United States agriculture (Section 2).
-
Lower Tariffs through Trade Agreements: By considering comprehensive trade agreements that focus on lower tariffs, the U.S. could see improved export opportunities (Section 3).
-
Protection of Producer Interests: The resolution seeks improved procedures to enforce trade laws and the enforcement of existing market access commitments to help agricultural producers (Section 4).
-
Removal of Trade Barriers: The proposal aims to eliminate unwarranted nontariff trade barriers through efficient dispute settlement processes (Section 5).
-
Science-Based Global Trading: The pursuit of a global trading system based on sound science through various international bodies and agreements could stabilize the trading environment (Section 6).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts or burdens are explicitly detailed within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Farmers+7Good For Business Owners+5Good For Rural Residents+5
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Trade+6Improves Diplomatic Engagement+4Improves International Alliances+4Increases Foreign Aid+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+5Increases Job Creation+5Improves Small Business Support+3
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+4
- 3/21/2025
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- 3/18/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 13 Cosponsors added.
Sanford BishopDemocrat · Georgia
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Randy FeenstraRepublican · Iowa
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Josh HarderDemocrat · California
Jeff HurdRepublican · Colorado
Darin LaHoodRepublican · Illinois
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Max MillerRepublican · Ohio
Dan NewhouseRepublican · Washington
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Adrian SmithRepublican · Nebraska
Bradley SchneiderDemocrat · Illinois
Eric SorensenDemocrat · Illinois
Bennie ThompsonDemocrat · Mississippi
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan