Bill · H.Res. 180· House(119-HRES-180)
Supporting the designation of March 2025 as National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month.
- Introduced
- 3/3/2025
- Last activity
- 3/3/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Sponsored by
- Mark Green
- Cosponsors
- - 0 - 6
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution supports designating March 2025 as National Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month. It highlights that colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer death and notes that screening tests can find and remove polyps before they become cancerous. The text points out that regular screenings can prevent many deaths and detect the disease early when treatment works best. It mentions that many adults over 50 are not up to date with their recommended screenings. Finally, the resolution encourages the people of the United States to observe the month with appropriate awareness and educational activities.
Yes
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+3
The bill encourages screenings for adults over 50 to prevent colorectal cancer deaths.
Would retired people be better off under this?+3
The emphasis on screening for those over 50 benefits the retired population.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+2
The resolution promotes public awareness of preventative screenings to improve health outcomes.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Encouraging Awareness and Education: The resolution encourages the people of the United States to observe March 2025 with appropriate awareness and educational activities, which can help provide information about prevention, screening methods, and symptoms for early detection (Resolved paragraph (2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Negative Impacts Identified: The provided text does not contain any sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Retirees+3Good For Seniors+3
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+2
- 3/3/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Haley StevensDemocrat · Michigan
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
Frederica WilsonDemocrat · Florida