Bill · H.Res. 15· House(119-HRES-15)
Rescinding the subpoenas issued by the January 6th Select Committee on September 23, 2021, October 6, 2021, and February 9, 2022, and withdrawing the recommendations finding Stephen K. Bannon, Mark Randall Meadows, Daniel Scavino, Jr., and Peter K. Navarro in contempt of Congress.
- Introduced
- 1/6/2025
- Last activity
- 1/6/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Eric Burlison
- Cosponsors
- - 12 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution declares that the January 6th Select Committee was illegitimate and partisan because of how members were appointed. It officially rescinds the subpoenas that were issued on September 23, 2021, October 6, 2021, and February 9, 2022. It withdraws the contempt of Congress recommendations made against Stephen K. Bannon, Mark Randall Meadows, Daniel Scavino, Jr., and Peter K. Navarro. The text states that the previous committee failed to include the required number of members and operated without a ranking minority member. It claims that the committee promoted uncorroborated evidence and withheld or destroyed information. Finally, the resolution directs the Speaker of the House to notify the Department of Justice that the subpoenas are now null and void.
Yes
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+5
The resolution ends the contempt proceedings and legal pressure against specific political figures.
The opposite
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?-4
The bill rescinds subpoenas and withdrawals of contempt that would have facilitated the collection of information regarding the January 6th attack.
Does this make elections run better?-3
The resolution seeks to nullify investigations that the text claims were intended to influence future elections.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Withdrawal of Contempt Recommendations: The resolution withdraws the contempt of Congress recommendations for Stephen K. Bannon, Mark Randall Meadows, Daniel Scavino, Jr., and Peter K. Navarro under resolved sections (3), (4), and (5). This could be seen as positive for those individuals because it ends the enforcement of those specific contempt actions by the House.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
Based on the provided text, there are no explicitly stated potential negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States resulting from the provisions of this bill.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+5Improves Government Transparency-4Improves Electoral Process-3
- 1/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/7/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 1/6/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Josh BrecheenRepublican · Oklahoma
Michael CloudRepublican · Texas
Elijah CraneRepublican · Arizona
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Clay HigginsRepublican · Louisiana
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Thomas MassieRepublican · Kentucky
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
John RoseRepublican · Tennessee
Keith SelfRepublican · Texas
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas