Bill · H.Res. 143· House(119-HRES-143)
Impeaching Paul Engelmayer, judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, for high crimes and misdemeanors.
- Introduced
- 2/18/2025
- Last activity
- 2/18/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Derrick Van Orden
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution impeaches Paul Engelmayer, a judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, for high crimes and misdemeanors. It was submitted in the House of Representatives by Mr. Van Orden on February 18, 2025. The text contains two articles outlining the charges against the judge. Article I focuses on judicial misconduct and abuse of judicial authority related to halting an Executive order. Article II focuses on the abuse of judicial power by using authority to further personal or political interests. The resolution concludes that Judge Engelmayer is guilty and should be removed from office.
Yes
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+5
By addressing alleged bias and improper rulings, the resolution seeks to uphold the principle of impartial application of the law.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3
The impeachment process aims to hold a federal judge accountable for alleged misuse of judicial authority and political bias.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Holding Officials Accountable: The resolution seeks to hold a federal judge accountable by impeaching him for high crimes and misdemeanors, specifically for halting an Executive order establishing the Department of Government Efficiency on purely political grounds, as stated in Article I.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Lack of Explicitly Listed Benefits for the General Public: The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions outlining positive outcomes or benefits for everyday individuals or groups of people, as it focuses entirely on the impeachment of a specific federal judge.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+5Improves Government Transparency+3
- 3/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/18/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Marjorie GreeneRepublican · Georgia