DemocratBill · H.Res. 1389· House(119-HRES-1389)

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the monitoring and regulation of water systems not be weaponized for the purposes of surveilling, tracking, or detecting use of, stigmatizing, and further restricting access to medication abortion care.

Rep. Pettersen
Age: 45 years
Colorado
Introduced
6/24/2026
Last activity
6/24/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Sponsored by
Brittany Pettersen
Cosponsors
None
Health
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.

What this bill would do

This resolution expresses the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the monitoring of water systems. It states that the regulation of water systems should not be used to surveil, track, or detect the use of medication abortion care. The text argues that efforts to detect medications like mifepristone in water systems are politically motivated and lack scientific justification. It further asserts that such actions represent a weaponization of environmental laws. Ultimately, the resolution calls for water safety strategies to be based on science rather than political interference.

Yes· 3 of 6

  • Would women be better off under this?+8

    The resolution protects against political efforts to surveil and restrict access to medication abortion care.

  • Does this make abortion easier to get?+8

    The resolution opposes using water system monitoring as a tool to surveil, track, and restrict access to medication abortion care.

  • Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+5

    The resolution opposes the diversion of environmental budgetary resources toward scientifically unjustified water testing.

The opposite

No question was scored the opposite.