Bill · H.Res. 1245· House(119-HRES-1245)
Recognizing the importance of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program to protect the United States' scientific integrity, public health, environment, and economic growth.
- Introduced
- 4/30/2026
- Last activity
- 4/30/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Sponsored by
- Luz Rivas
- Cosponsors
- - 8 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution recognizes the importance of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. The program was established by the EPA in 2009 to track greenhouse gas emissions from large sources, fuel suppliers, and carbon dioxide injection sites. It provides transparent and accurate data regarding the magnitude and distribution of heat-trapping pollutants. The resolution asserts that the data is critical for environmental protection, various federal agency initiatives, and academic and financial research. It further states that the program helps empower communities and businesses. Finally, the resolution recognizes that rolling back the program would undermine progress in protecting public health, the environment, and economic growth.
Yes· 3 of 12
Would Black Americans be better off under this?+7
The resolution asserts the program protects Black Americans from significant health risks related to industrial pollution.
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?+7
The resolution asserts the program protects Latino communities from high rates of asthma and pollution exposure.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+7
The resolution states that the data is critical for EPA initiatives to protect the environment through regulatory standards.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection of Public Health and Environment: The program provides data used to protect the United States' scientific integrity, public health, environment, and economic growth (Resolution text).
-
Empowerment of Communities: The data allows environmental justice communities to understand pollution sources, advocate for cleaner air, and hold government and industry accountable (Resolution text). It also allows residents and community groups to push elected officials to develop protective standards (Resolution text).
-
Informing Regulatory Approaches: Data collected is critical for EPA initiatives such as New Source Performance Standards and the development of greenhouse gas Best Available Control Technology (Resolution text).
-
Support for Financial and Academic Research: The data is of significant value to academic institutions for publishing climate change research and to financial research firms for analyzing risk assessment, sustainability goals, and market competitiveness (Resolution text).
-
Assisting Federal Agency Initiatives: The data is critical to the Department of the Treasury's administration of energy tax credits and the Department of Energy's life cycle emissions analysis model (Resolution text).
-
Access to Local Pollution Data: Through the Facility Level Information on Greenhouse Gases Tool, the program allows local communities access to pollution data from nearby facilities (Resolution text).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Harm to Vulnerable Communities: Repealing the program would disproportionately harm Latino, Black, Indigenous, and low-income communities that are most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change (Resolution text).
-
Increased Health Risks: The text notes that large polluting facilities emit copollutants like benzene, formaldehyde, and ethylbenzene which increase risks of cancer, low birth weight, and impaired lung function (Resolution text).
-
Financial Burdens on States: A rollback of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program would cause States to incur additional costs in their efforts to combat climate change (Resolution text).
-
Loss of Transparency: Rolling back the program would erode transparency and the confidence in government regulations intended to protect the public from environmental and public health harm (Resolution text).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For African Americans+7Good For Hispanic Americans+7Good For Children+6Good For Low Income Households+6Good For Native Americans+6Good For Seniors+5Good For Urban Residents+4
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+7Reduces Carbon Emissions+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity+7
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+5
- Healthcare
- Improves Opioid Crisis Response+5
- 5/26/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/30/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
Julia BrownleyDemocrat · California
Nanette BarragánDemocrat · California
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Adelita GrijalvaDemocrat · Arizona
Pablo HernándezDemocrat · Puerto Rico
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Scott PetersDemocrat · California