Bill · H.Res. 1225· House(119-HRES-1225)
Original Resolution Commending the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for its efforts to facilitate peace between the United States and Israel with Iran
- Introduced
- 4/29/2026
- Last activity
- 4/29/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Al Green
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution, titled the "Original Resolution Commending the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for its efforts to facilitate peace between the United States and Israel with Iran," seeks to officially recognize Pakistan's role in mediation. The text notes that the ongoing conflict has caused significant loss of life and the displacement of up to 3.2 million people. It also highlights the human and financial costs to the United States, including casualties among U.S. Armed Forces and high daily expenditures. The resolution identifies Pakistan as a key, neutral mediator providing a secure location for peace talks. Ultimately, the House of Representatives intends to acknowledge and commend Pakistan for its efforts to facilitate lasting peace.
Yes· 3 of 13
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?+9
The resolution commends the use of diplomatic mediation through Pakistan to reach a peaceful conclusion to the war.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+8
The resolution notes that ending the conflict could mitigate the $1 billion per day expenditure currently incurred by the United States.
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?+7
Ending the conflict would cease the high daily expenditures and the human cost to the U.S. Armed Forces.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Ending the Conflict: The text states that an end to the conflict would benefit countries in the Middle East and nations across the globe, particularly regarding energy supplies and petroleum products.
-
Reduction in Human Toll: An end to the war would address the loss of thousands of lives, including men, women, and children, and the displacement of up to 3.2 million individuals.
-
Protection of U.S. Servicemembers: Ending the war would mitigate the direct cost to U.S. servicemembers and their families, noting that at least 13 members of the Armed Forces have been killed and over 399 wounded.
-
Economic Stability: Resolving the conflict could address the extraordinary financial costs to the United States, which are estimated at approximately $1 billion per day.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Domestic Turmoil: The text notes that further escalation of the conflict, such as the deployment of United States ground forces in Iran, would create strife, disunity, and turmoil within the United States of America.
-
Hardship in Pakistan: Pakistan has already borne hardship, including enacting citywide shutdowns to accommodate diplomatic delegations during its peacemaking efforts.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+6Good For Men+5Good For Veterans+5Good For Women+5Good For Low Income Households+4
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Diplomatic Engagement+9Reduces Military Spending+7Improves International Alliances+5Improves Veterans Benefits+4
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+8Reduces Inflation+5
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Reduces Gas Prices+6
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+3
- 4/29/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.