Bill · H.Res. 11· House(119-HRES-11)
Fair Representation Amendment
- Introduced
- 1/3/2025
- Last activity
- 1/3/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
- Sponsored by
- Warren Davidson
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution is called the Fair Representation Amendment. It directs specific House committees to review the laws under their jurisdiction. Within six months of the resolution's adoption, these committees must submit law changes to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. The goal of these changes is to eliminate excessive Executive Branch discretion in how those laws are applied. Finally, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform must quickly report this legislation without making any substantive revisions, under the short title Article One Restoration Act.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+5
By reducing executive branch discretion, the bill shifts power away from the executive toward legislative control.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3
The bill seeks to limit administrative discretion through a formal legislative review and reporting process.
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+1
The bill mandates a review of laws under the jurisdiction of the Committee on Veterans Affairs to limit executive discretion.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 2: Several House committees, including the Committee on Agriculture, Committee on Armed Services, and Committee on Veterans Affairs, are required to review existing laws within six months to eliminate excessive Executive Branch discretion. This could benefit people by holding our elected officials and government accountable for how laws are applied.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Section 3: The text does not provide enough information to identify specific negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+5Improves Government Transparency+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Veterans+1
- Education And Technology
- Improves School Choice+1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+1
- 1/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/3/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Paul GosarRepublican · Arizona