Bill · H.Res. 1078· House(119-HRES-1078)
Of inquiry requesting the President and directing the Secretary of Health and Human Services to transmit, respectively, certain documents to the House of Representatives relating to the "Defend the Spend" freeze on child care payments to all States, Tribes, and Territories.
- Introduced
- 2/25/2026
- Last activity
- 2/25/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Sponsored by
- Judy Chu
- Cosponsors
- - 18 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution is an inquiry that requests the President and directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide certain documents to the House of Representatives. The request focuses on the "Defend the Spend" freeze regarding child care payments to States, Tribes, and Territories. It seeks various records, including communications, audits, and legal analyses, related to the freezing of payments. Specifically, it looks into actions taken by HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O'Neill on December 30, 2025. The resolution also targets information regarding payment system delays, alleged fraud, and the management of entitlement funding.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The resolution seeks to increase transparency by requiring the release of internal communications regarding the 'Defend the Spend' freeze.
Would children be better off under this?+3
The inquiry aims to protect the stability of child care payments for children.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+3
Securing child care funding helps support families in lower economic brackets.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Accountability through documentation: By requesting all communications, including audio recordings and legal analyses, the resolution aims to uncover information regarding the "Defend the Spend" freeze and its impact on child care payments (Resolution Section 1).
-
Investigation of funding delays: The resolution seeks information regarding payment management system delays and procedures for addressing funding delays after April 15, 2025, which relates to entitlement funding (Resolution Section 3).
-
Protection of providers: The resolution requests documents regarding social media posts that alleged child care fraud and resulted in threats to and harassment of individual child care providers (Resolution Section 4).
-
Oversight of fund misuse allegations: It asks for information regarding warning letters, referrals to the Office of the Inspector General, or other disciplinary actions concerning alleged funding misuse (Resolution Section 5).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Potential freeze on child care payments: The resolution refers to a freeze on all Administration for Children and Families (ACF) payments and the reinstitution of "Defend the Spend" procedures as of December 30, 2025 (Resolution Section 1).
-
Possible drawdown of allocations: The text mentions the drawdown of Child Care Entitlement to States (CCES) allocations by States, Territories, or Tribal grantees (Resolution Section 2).
-
Potential for delayed access to funding: The resolution seeks information regarding efforts to "provide, delay, or prevent access to entitlement funding" (Resolution Section 11).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Children+3Good For Low Income Households+3Good For Business Owners+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Childcare Affordability+3
- 2/25/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 18 Cosponsors added.
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Brendan BoyleDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Lloyd DoggettDemocrat · Texas
Suzan DelBeneDemocrat · Washington
Dwight EvansDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Jimmy GomezDemocrat · California
Steven HorsfordDemocrat · Nevada
John LarsonDemocrat · Connecticut
Gwen MooreDemocrat · Wisconsin
Richard NealDemocrat · Massachusetts
Stacey PlaskettDemocrat · Virgin Islands
Jimmy PanettaDemocrat · California
Linda SánchezDemocrat · California
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Bradley SchneiderDemocrat · Illinois
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Mike ThompsonDemocrat · California