Bill · H.Res. 1030· House(119-HRES-1030)
To end ICE abuse.
- Introduced
- 2/2/2026
- Last activity
- 2/2/2026 — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Homeland Security, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Ro Khanna
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
This resolution aims to end what it describes as ICE abuse through significant structural changes. It proposes voting against new funding for the Department of Homeland Security and repealing a $75,000,000,000 funding allocation for ICE. The resolution seeks to initiate impeachment proceedings against the Secretary of Homeland Security and the United States Attorney General. It also calls for ending qualified immunity for ICE agents and directing investigations into agents who violate the law. Additionally, the resolution plans to replace ICE with a new agency under the Department of Justice that features civilian oversight. Finally, it establishes new standards for use of force, identification, and detention facility human rights.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this change how police departments operate?+9
The resolution ends qualified immunity, mandates body cameras, and establishes a national use-of-force standard.
Would immigrants be better off under this?+8
The bill implements human rights protections, medical care guarantees, and civilian oversight for detention facilities.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+8
The bill mandates body cameras, prohibits masks, and requires public reporting of investigation findings.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-10
The resolution repeals a $75 billion funding allocation for ICE and votes against new funding for DHS.
Does this tighten control of the border?-5
The bill reduces funding for ICE and changes the structure of immigration enforcement agencies.
Does this give the federal government more power?-3
The bill moves oversight of immigration enforcement to the Department of Justice.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Accountability for Misconduct: Ending qualified immunity and directing independent authorities to investigate and prosecute agents who violate the law aims to ensure meaningful civil accountability for unlawful use of force (Provisions 4 and 5).
-
Improved Transparency and Identification: Prohibiting the use of masks and requiring active body cameras and clearly visible identification could increase transparency during operations (Provision 9).
-
Standardized Conduct: Codifying a clear, uniform, and enforceable national use-of-force standard would allow courts to hold rogue actors accountable under civil rights laws (Provision 7).
-
Protection Against Profiling: Prohibiting practices such as racial profiling and "Kavanaugh stops" would target specific enforcement practices (Provision 6).
-
Improved Detention Standards: Upholding human rights standards through independent inspections, guaranteed medical care, and mandatory reporting aims to protect those in immigration detention facilities (Provision 10).
-
New Oversight Structure: Replacing ICE with a new agency within the Department of Justice could provide robust civilian oversight and institutional integrity (Provision 8).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Loss of Funding: The resolution calls for voting against any new funding for the Department of Homeland Security and repealing a $75,000,000,000 funding allocation for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Provisions 1 and 2).
-
Political Instability through Impeachment: The resolution seeks to initiate impeachment proceedings against the Secretary of Homeland Security and the United States Attorney General (Provision 3).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants+8Good For Hispanic Americans+6
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+8Improves Due Process+7Increases Federal Power-3
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending-10
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Policing Reform+9Improves Racial Equity+7Improves Border Security-5Improves Pathway To Citizenship-2
- 2/2/2026
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Homeland Security, and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.