Bill · H.Res. 100· House(119-HRES-100)
Expressing support for the continued value of arms control agreements and negotiated constraints on Russian and Chinese strategic nuclear forces.
- Introduced
- 2/4/2025
- Last activity
- 2/4/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Bill Foster
- Cosponsors
- - 31 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
A House resolution is the House speaking for itself: stating a position, honouring someone, or setting its own rules. Adopting it is the whole process. Once the House agrees to it, it is officially the House's word; it is not a law, so the Senate and the President have no part in it.
What this bill would do
H. Res. 100 expresses support for the continued value of arms control agreements and negotiated constraints on Russian and Chinese strategic nuclear forces. The text condemns the Russian Federation's nuclear escalatory rhetoric, veiled threats, and its purported suspension of the New START Treaty. It emphasizes the importance of transparency, verification measures, and onsite inspections that have provided insight into Russia's nuclear arsenal. The resolution calls for an immediate cessation of nuclear saber rattling and urges the Russian Federation to return to full implementation of the New START Treaty. Additionally, it calls on the administration to pursue a dialogue with Russia on a new post-2026 nuclear arms control framework and to continue engaging the People's Republic of China in bilateral talks on nuclear risk reduction and arms control.
Yes· 3 of 7
Does this favour talking over confrontation abroad?+7
The resolution calls for active dialogue with Russia and China regarding nuclear risk reduction and new arms control frameworks.
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?+5
By pursuing arms control frameworks, the resolution seeks to avoid the high costs of a new nuclear arms race.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+5
The resolution aims to prevent a costly and unrestrained nuclear arms race through continued arms control agreements.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Encouraging Nuclear Risk Reduction and Stability: The resolution calls on the administration to continue active dialogue with the Russian Federation on a new nuclear arms control framework and risk reduction, which aims to maintain strategic stability and avoid an unrestrained nuclear arms race following the expiration of the New START Treaty as noted in Resolved (6).
-
Maintaining Numerical Limits on Nuclear Forces: The text calls upon both the United States and the Russian Federation to continue to respect the numerical constraints on strategic deployed nuclear forces established by the New START Treaty until a new framework is established, helping to limit nuclear arsenals as mentioned in Resolved (7).
-
Promoting Communication with China: The resolution calls on the administration to continue engaging the People's Republic of China in further bilateral talks on nuclear risk reduction and arms control, and to pursue new multilateral arms control efforts as stated in Resolved (8).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences, burdens, or adverse impacts for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Diplomatic Engagement+7Reduces Military Spending+5Improves International Alliances+4
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+2Good For Urban Residents+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+1
- 8/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/15/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/25/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/5/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/4/2025
- Submitted in House
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 13 Cosponsors added.
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Joe CourtneyDemocrat · Connecticut
Sean CastenDemocrat · Illinois
Gilbert CisnerosDemocrat · California
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Sylvia GarciaDemocrat · Texas
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Teresa Leger FernandezDemocrat · New Mexico
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Rick LarsenDemocrat · Washington
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Gregory MeeksDemocrat · New York
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Eleanor NortonDemocrat · District of Columbia
Donald NorcrossDemocrat · New Jersey
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Adam SmithDemocrat · Washington
Eric SwalwellDemocrat · California
Emilia SykesDemocrat · Ohio
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
Juan VargasDemocrat · California