Bill · H.R. 9642· House(119-HR-9642)
Medicare Access to Rural Anesthesiology Act
- Introduced
- 7/13/2026
- Last activity
- 7/15/2026 — Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 0.
- Sponsored by
- John Moolenaar
- Cosponsors
- - 6 - 4
- Introduced
What this bill would do
The Medicare Access to Rural Anesthesiology Act seeks to amend the Social Security Act regarding payment for anesthesia services. It targets specific rural hospitals and critical access hospitals that employ or contract with an anesthesiologist. For these qualifying hospitals, Medicare Part A payments for anesthesia services provided by an anesthesiologist would be made on a reasonable cost basis. To qualify, hospitals must meet certain surgical volume requirements and ensure the anesthesiologist does not bill under Part B. This change aims to reclassify these services as part of inpatient hospital services rather than separate medical services.
Yes· 3 of 18
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+6
Directly targets rural and critical access hospitals to protect local anesthesia and surgical services.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+6
Ensures continued local access to surgical and anesthesia care in rural and critical access hospitals.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+5
Beneficial for older Medicare beneficiaries relying on rural and critical access hospitals.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Payment Adjustment for Rural Hospitals: Certain rural and critical access hospitals will receive payment for anesthesia services on a reasonable cost basis rather than through Part B billing (Section 2(a)(1)). This change applies to hospitals that meet specific surgical volume limits and staffing requirements.
-
Streamlined Service Classification: Anesthesia services provided by anesthesiologists in these specific hospitals will be treated as part of inpatient hospital services (Section 2(a)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Strict Eligibility Requirements for Hospitals: To receive the new payment structure, hospitals must prove they have a specific volume of surgical procedures, not exceeding 800 (or a number determined by the Secretary), in the previous year (Section 2(a)(1)(ii)).
-
Staffing Limitations: The benefit is limited to hospitals that employ or contract with no more than one full-time equivalent physician who is an anesthesiologist (Section 2(a)(1)(ii)(I)).
-
Billing Restrictions: Anesthesiologists must agree not to bill under Part B for the professional services they furnish at these hospitals to qualify for the arrangement (Section 2(a)(1)(ii)(I)(cc)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+6Good For Retirees+5Good For Seniors+5Good For Low Income Households+4Good For Veterans+4Good For Children+3Good For Farmers+3Good For Middle Aged+3Good For Middle Class Households+3Good For Native Americans+3Good For People With Disabilities+3Good For Women+3Good For Young Adults+3Good For Business Owners+2
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+6Increases Medicare Funding+5
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+4
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+2
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/10/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/15/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 41 - 0.
- 7/14/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 7/13/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Introduced in House
Monica De La CruzRepublican · Texas
Marie PerezDemocrat · Washington
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Austin ScottRepublican · Georgia
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Eric SorensenDemocrat · Illinois
David ValadaoRepublican · California