DemocratBill · H.R. 9619· House(119-HR-9619)

People-First Chatbot Act

Rep. Foushee
Age: 70 years
North Carolina
Introduced
7/9/2026
Last activity
7/9/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Sponsored by
Valerie Foushee
Cosponsors
Democrat - 1Republican - 0
Science, Technology, Communications
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The "People-First Chatbot Act" establishes strict requirements for artificial intelligence chatbot providers regarding data privacy and security. It prohibits providers from using chat logs for advertising, selling chat logs, or processing data for users under 18 without parental consent. The bill mandates that users have the right to access or delete their chat logs and requires providers to implement comprehensive data security programs. Additionally, it requires monthly risk assessments to prevent emotional dependence or compulsive usage, especially for minors. The Act also mandates clear disclosures to ensure users know they are interacting with an AI rather than a human.

Yes· 3 of 19

  • Does this protect people from being watched or searched?+9

    The bill creates significant new privacy rights for users regarding their chat logs and personal data.

  • Does this give people more control over their personal data?+9

    The bill establishes strong protections for personal data and chat logs against unauthorized processing.

  • Would children be better off under this?+8

    The bill includes strong protections for minors, including consent requirements and bans on harmful design features.

The opposite

  • Would business owners be better off under this?-5

    The bill imposes significant compliance burdens and financial liabilities on business entities.

  • Would billionaires be better off under this?-5

    The bill imposes significant compliance burdens and financial liabilities on large-scale business entities.

  • Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-3

    The bill limits government access to chat logs via warrants, which could be viewed as a restriction on surveillance capabilities.