Bill · H.R. 9547· House(119-HR-9547)
Veterans and Servicemembers PTSD Emerging Treatment Review Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 6/30/2026
- Last activity
- 6/30/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- Sponsored by
- Abraham Hamadeh
- Cosponsors
- - 3 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill directs the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress regarding emerging investigational treatment options for treatment-resistant post-traumatic stress disorder. Specifically, the report must focus on data from a 2026 clinical trial involving organic whole psilocybin-containing mushrooms. The required report must cover operational relevance, safety, dosing, feasibility, and how the data applies to members of the Armed Forces and transitioning servicemembers. It also requires the Department of Defense to assess implications for force health protection, medical readiness, and suicide prevention strategies. Furthermore, the report must describe legal requirements for potential expanded access pathways involving Schedule I substances and address continuity of care between military and Veterans Health Administration medical facilities. The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs must submit this report within 180 days of the Act's enactment in coordination with other federal health agencies.
Yes· 3 of 13
Would veterans be better off under this, taking everything together?+8
The legislation directly focuses on investigating alternative treatments and improving continuity of care for veterans with treatment-resistant PTSD.
Does this help veterans get medical care?+7
The bill directly assesses clinical trial data, suicide prevention strategies, and continuity of care for veterans and transitioning servicemembers dealing with PTSD.
Does this increase the pay, pensions or support veterans receive?+7
By addressing force health protection, medical readiness, and continuity of care between military facilities and the VA, the bill supports veteran well-being.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(b) and Section 2(c)(1): This provision requires a report on safety, dosing, and adverse event data from clinical trials evaluating emerging treatments like whole-mushroom psilocybin for post-traumatic stress disorder. This could benefit veterans and servicemembers by pushing the government to closely examine alternative therapies when standard treatments fail.
-
Section 2(c)(2): This requires an assessment of how trial data impacts suicide prevention strategies and identifies gaps in existing treatments. This is positive because it directly targets the severe risks of chronic impairment and suicidality associated with treatment-resistant post-traumatic stress disorder.
-
Section 2(c)(5): This provision assesses considerations to ensure continuity of care for members transitioning from military medical treatment facilities to the Veterans Health Administration. This is a helpful step to ensure that healthcare, safety monitoring, and clinical oversight are not disrupted when a servicemember leaves the military.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Section 2(a)(3) and Section 2(f)(2): The text notes that existing therapies are not effective for all patients, and the bill deals with investigational Schedule I substances and treatments like whole-mushroom psilocybin. Because these are still experimental investigational options, patients relying on them face uncertainties regarding actual efficacy and potential unknown adverse events until the research is fully evaluated.
-
Section 2(c)(3) and Section 2(c)(4): These sections require descriptions of complex legal and regulatory requirements for expanded access pathways involving Schedule I substances, alongside federal right-to-try pathways. Navigating these strict federal rules and coordination requirements between agencies like the Food and Drug Administration and the Drug Enforcement Administration could create bureaucratic hurdles or delays for individuals seeking immediate access to treatments.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Veterans+8Good For Middle Aged+3Good For Young Adults+3Good For Retirees+2Good For Seniors+2
- Healthcare
- Improves Veterans Healthcare+7Improves Mental Health Access+6Improves Healthcare Access+4
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+4Increase States Rights+2Increases Federal Power+2
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Veterans Benefits+7
- Education And Technology
- Increases Scientific Research Funding+5
- 8/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/30/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Jennifer KiggansRepublican · Virginia
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts