Bill · H.R. 95· House(119-HR-95)
One Bill, One Subject Transparency Act
- Introduced
- 1/3/2025
- Last activity
- 1/3/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Andy Biggs
- Cosponsors
- None
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "One Bill, One Subject Transparency Act" aims to require that every bill or joint resolution passed by Congress focuses on only one subject. It mandates that the subject must be clearly and descriptively stated in the bill's title. For appropriation bills, the act prohibits including general legislation or law changes that are not related to the main subject. If a title covers multiple unrelated subjects, the entire act becomes void. Additionally, it provides a way for people or Members of Congress to take legal action against laws that do not follow these rules.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+8
The bill mandates that the subject of every bill be clearly and descriptively expressed in its title to increase clarity.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+5
The bill establishes a cause of action for individuals to seek judicial relief via a de novo standard of review.
Does this change how police departments operate?+1
The bill allows for legal challenges to laws that do not comply with single-subject requirements, which could affect policing legislation.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Transparency: The bill requires the subject of a bill to be clearly and descriptively expressed in the title (Section 2(b)), which helps people understand exactly what a law is about.
-
Prevention of Unrelated Laws in Funding Bills: Appropriation bills cannot include general legislation or changes to existing law that aren't related to the bill's main topic (Section 2(c)), which prevents unrelated rules from being tucked into spending bills.
-
Legal Accountability: Any person or Member of Congress who is aggrieved by a law that doesn't follow these rules can sue the United States for relief, such as an injunction (Section 3(e)).
-
Clear Judicial Review: In legal actions regarding these rules, the court will use a de novo standard of review (Section 3(f)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Risk of Lawlessness Due to Title Errors: If a title addresses two or more unrelated subjects, the entire Act or joint resolution is considered void (Section 3(a)).
-
Loss of Specific Provisions: If a law contains provisions that aren't clearly and descriptively expressed in the title, those specific provisions will be void (Section 3(b)).
-
Loss of Funding Provisions: If an appropriation bill includes a provision that falls outside the jurisdiction of the relevant subcommittee, that provision will be void (Section 3(c)).
-
Removal of Non-Germane Legislation: Any general legislation or change of law in an appropriation bill that is not germane to the subject matter will be void (Section 3(d)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+8Improves Due Process+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Policing Reform+1
- 1/3/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Introduced in House