Bill · H.R. 9393· House(119-HR-9393)
Lower Costs, More Transparency Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 6/23/2026
- Last activity
- 7/21/2026 — Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 0.
- Sponsored by
- Brett Guthrie
- Cosponsors
- - 0 - 1
- Introduced
What this bill would do
The Lower Costs, More Transparency Act of 2026 aims to promote price transparency across the health care sector. It requires specified hospitals, clinical diagnostic laboratories, imaging services, and ambulatory surgical centers to make their standard charges and shoppable service prices public. Group health plans must also provide transparency regarding cost-sharing amounts and rate/payment information. The legislation mandates oversight reports regarding the use of Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) and the feasibility of a "provider tool." Additionally, the government will study price differences across markets and the inclusion of quality-of-care data. Enforcement of these transparency rules includes various civil monetary penalties for non-compliant entities.
Yes· 3 of 9
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+6
The bill increases consumer protection by requiring hospitals, labs, and insurers to provide transparent pricing for services and detailed rate information.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The bill mandates various federal reports and requires health insurers and providers to make detailed pricing data available to the public.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+4
Increased price transparency through self-service tools and API reports allows patients to make more informed decisions about accessing care.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased visibility of hospital costs: Specified hospitals must publish standard charges and prices for at least 300 shoppable services in a consumer-friendly format (Section 2(a)(2)(A)(ii)(I)).
-
Improved access to pricing for laboratory tests: Applicable laboratories must make the discounted cash price or gross charge for specified clinical diagnostic laboratory tests available on their websites (Section 3(a)(1)(A)).
-
Clearer pricing for imaging services: Providers of specified imaging services must make the discounted cash price or gross charge public on an internet website (Section 4(a)(1)(A)).
-
Transparent pricing for surgical centers: Ambulatory surgical centers are required to compile and make public their standard charges and prices for shoppable services (Section 5(a)(2)(A)).
-
Better cost-sharing information for health plan members: Group health plans must provide participants information on cost-sharing amounts, such as deductibles and copayments, upon request through a self-service tool (Section 6(b)(1)).
-
Enhanced transparency for health insurance rates: Group health plans and insurance issuers must make rate and payment information available to the public (Section 6(c)(1)).
-
Support for non-English speakers: The Secretary will ensure through rulemaking that hospitals take reasonable steps to make charge and price information accessible to individuals with limited English proficiency through translations or interpretation services (Section 2(b)).
-
Increased Price Transparency through Technology: The bill calls for an evaluation of using APIs to allow consumers to access rate and payment information, as well as their specific cost-sharing amounts, through third-party internet tools (Subsection (b)(4)).
-
Improved Patient Decision-Making: A proposed "provider tool" is intended to aid in patient decision-making by providing healthcare providers with information regarding plan costs (Subsection (c)(1)(B)).
-
Enhanced Shopping for Services: The use of APIs may increase the ability for individuals to "shop" for services by providing real-time access to pricing and cost-sharing information (Subsection (b)(4), (b)(5)).
-
Identification of Pricing Disparities: Regular reports will assess differences in negotiated prices between rural and urban areas, as well as between various market types, which could highlight inequities (Subsection (d)(2)).
-
Potential for Quality Comparisons: The government will study how to include healthcare quality data alongside price information, which could help people choose better care (Subsection (e)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Financial penalties for hospitals: Hospitals that fail to comply with transparency requirements are subject to civil monetary penalties that can increase based on the number of beds or the duration of noncompliance (Section 2(a)(4)(B)).
-
Financial penalties for laboratories: Applicable laboratories that fail to comply with price transparency requirements can face civil more than $300 per day (Section 3(a)(5)(A)(ii)).
-
Financial penalties for imaging providers: Providers of specified imaging services can be subject to civil monetary penalties of up to $300 per day for noncompliance (Section 4(a)(5)(A)(iii)).
-
Financial penalties for surgical centers: Ambulatory surgical centers may face civil monetary penalties of up to $300 per day for failing to meet transparency requirements (Section 5(a)(4)(B)(i)).
-
Increased Costs for Private Entities: The bill notes that the implementation of API standards could create costs for issuers, employers, and other private-sector entities (Subsection (b)(7)).
-
Potential Burden of New Tools: The creation and maintenance of a "provider tool" may result in a burden and cost for plans, coverage, providers, issuers, and employers (Subsection (c)(1)(J)).
-
Regulatory and Enforcement Costs: The reports required by this bill will analyze the costs to the Federal Government and States to regulate and enforce API and provider tool standards (Subsection (b)(8), (c)(1)(K)).
-
Privacy Risks: The implementation of new data-sharing technologies like APIs requires an analysis of how they interact with federal health information privacy standards, suggesting potential risks to data security (Subsection (b)(1), (b)(9)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Middle Class Households+3Good For Low Income Households+2Good For Rural Residents+2Good For Urban Residents+2
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+4Increases Affordable Care Act Support+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+6
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+2
- 7/21/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 45 - 0.
- 7/20/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- 6/25/2026
- Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee by Voice Vote.
- 6/23/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Frank PalloneDemocrat · New Jersey