Bill · H.R. 9388· House(119-HR-9388)
One-Stop Pilot Program Extension Act
- Introduced
- 6/23/2026
- Last activity
- 7/14/2026 — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
- Sponsored by
- Carlos Gimenez
- Cosponsors
- - 0 - 1
- Introduced
- Passed House
- In Senate committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the One-Stop Pilot Program Extension Act. It amends title 49 of the United States Code. The bill authorizes an extension of a program for screened passengers and their property. This applies to direct flights arriving from certain foreign last point of departure airports. These passengers can continue on additional flights within the United States without extra screening. Specifically, it updates the rules for checked baggage re-screening and extends the program timeline from six to ten years.
Yes· 3 of 8
Does this tighten control of the border?+2
The bill maintains secure border enforcement requirements by ensuring CBP receives timely baggage images and retains authority to flag passengers for inspection.
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+1
Travelers benefit from streamlined baggage re-screening rules on connecting domestic flights.
Would people in middle age be better off under this?+1
Travelers benefit from streamlined baggage re-screening rules on connecting domestic flights.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Convenience for Travelers: Under section 2(a), checked baggage arriving on direct flights from participating foreign airports can continue on additional U.S. flights without additional TSA security re-screening. This is allowed if the initial baggage screening used an explosives detection system, passengers cannot access their bags until their final destination, CBP receives timely baggage images for border security, and CBP does not flag the passenger or baggage for further inspection. This makes travel smoother for passengers by removing the burden of extra baggage checks.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions identified that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For High Income Households+1Good For Middle Aged+1Good For Middle Class Households+1Good For Seniors+1Good For Young Adults+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves International Alliances+1
- 7/14/2026
- Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
- 7/13/2026
- Reported by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 119-740.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 644.
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4393)
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4393)
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 9388.
- Considered under suspension of the rules.
- Mr. Garbarino moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill. (consideration: CR H4393-4394)
- 6/24/2026
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported by the Yeas and Nays: 30 - 0.
- 6/23/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Troy CarterDemocrat · Louisiana