Bill · H.R. 9343· House(119-HR-9343)
Easy Access to Mail Act
- Introduced
- 6/18/2026
- Last activity
- 6/18/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- Sponsored by
- Tim Burchett
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is called the Easy Access to Mail Act and it sets rules for the United States Postal Service regarding centralized mail delivery for certain homes. It stops the Postal Service from changing the mail delivery method to centralized delivery for existing housing developments that currently use a different method. For new housing developments, the Postal Service must get approval from the local or state legislature before using centralized delivery. If approval is granted, the postmaster must give notice and a 60-day public comment period to local governments, planning commissions, residents, property owners, and home builders. The bill also directs the Postal Regulatory Commission to make sure the Postal Service does not change policies in a way that negatively affects rural, lower income, elderly, disabled, or predominantly minority communities.
Yes· 3 of 18
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+3
The bill requires local or state legislative approval for centralized mail delivery in new housing developments.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3
The legislation mandates public notice and a 60-day comment period for local mail delivery changes.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+3
Residents and property owners gain protections against unwanted changes to centralized mail delivery.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Protection for Existing Neighborhoods: Under section 2(a) adding new section 3693(b), the Postal Service cannot switch existing housing developments over to centralized mail delivery if they already use a different method. This keeps mail delivery how people are used to in their neighborhoods.
-
Local Control for New Homes: Under section 2(a) adding new section 3693(c)(1), the Postal Service is barred from requiring centralized delivery for newly constructed housing developments without getting prior approval from the local or state legislative body first. This gives local elected officials a say in how mail is delivered to new homes.
-
Public Input: Under section 2(a) adding new section 3693(c)(2), if local approval is granted for a new housing development, the local postmaster must provide written notice and a 60-day window for public comment. This lets residents, property owners, and home builders weigh in on the mail delivery method.
-
Safeguards for Vulnerable Communities: Under section 2(c), the Postal Regulatory Commission must ensure the Postal Service does not change any policy that would disproportionately hurt rural, lower income, elderly, disabled, or predominantly minority communities. This protects vulnerable groups from unfair policy shifts.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Potential Negative Impacts Identified: Based strictly on the provided text, there are no specific sections or provisions that outline negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+2Good For Middle Class Households+2Good For People With Disabilities+2Good For Retirees+2Good For Rural Residents+2Good For Seniors+2Good For African Americans+1Good For Asian Americans+1Good For Business Owners+1Good For Hispanic Americans+1Good For Native Americans+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+3Increase States Rights+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+3Improves Small Business Support+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Disability Rights+2Improves Racial Equity+2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+2
- 6/18/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
2 bills Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
David KustoffRepublican · Tennessee