Bill · H.R. 9277· House(119-HR-9277)
To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that judicial review under the Administrative Procedure Act does not include any evidence that the court determines is not the product of reliable scientific principles and methods.
Age: 64 years
Wyoming
- Introduced
- 6/11/2026
- Last activity
- 6/11/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Harriet Hageman
- Cosponsors
- None
Government Operations and Politics
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes to change title 5 of the United States Code. It would change how judicial review works under the Administrative Procedure Act. Specifically, it prevents courts from using evidence that they decide is not based on reliable scientific principles and methods. It also excludes evidence that does not reflect a reliable application of those principles and methods.
Yes
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+3
Ensures judicial review is based on reliable scientific principles, potentially improving the quality of administrative law decisions.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Requirement for Reliable Science: By adding subparagraph (G) to Section 706(2), the bill ensures that court reviews are not based on evidence that the court determines lacks reliable scientific principles and methods.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Court Discretion: Under the proposed subparagraph (G), the court is the entity that determines if evidence is the product of reliable scientific principles and methods or a reliable application of those methods, which could limit the types of evidence used in judicial reviews.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+3
- 6/11/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Introduced in House