Bill · H.R. 9188· House(119-HR-9188)
Military Readiness Permitting Efficiency Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 6/8/2026
- Last activity
- 6/8/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- Sponsored by
- Sarah Elfreth
- Cosponsors
- - 0 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Military Readiness Permitting Efficiency Act of 2026 allows the Secretary of Defense or a military department secretary to make agreements with the Directors of the National Marine Fisheries Service or the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. These agreements are meant to speed up reviews for priority military programs and projects. Under these deals, the Department of Defense provides money to hire the staff needed to perform the reviews. This applies to reviews required by the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
Yes
Is this likely to create jobs?+2
Provides funding to hire additional personnel at the National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+2
Increases staffing for agencies tasked with executing reviews under the Endangered Species and Marine Mammal Protection Acts.
Does this give the federal government more power?+1
Facilitates interagency agreements to expedite priority federal military projects.
The opposite
Does this reduce what is spent on the military?-1
Authorizes the Department of Defense to provide additional financial assistance to other agencies.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Faster Project Reviews: By providing direct financial assistance to hire personnel, priority military programs and projects can undergo review processes more quickly, provided it is in the interest of national defense (Section 2(a)(1) and (a)(2)).
-
Increased Agency Staffing: The National Marine Fisheries Service and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service can receive funds to hire personnel when they lack sufficient funds or staff to meet review timelines (Section 2(a)(1)(B) and (a)(2)(B)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts for individuals or groups were explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+1
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Reduces Military Spending-1
- 6/8/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Jack BergmanRepublican · Michigan