Bill · H.R. 8309· House(119-HR-8309)
To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit Presidents and Vice Presidents from receiving damages payments from the United States, and for other purposes.
- Introduced
- 4/15/2026
- Last activity
- 4/15/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Jamie Raskin
- Cosponsors
- - 4 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes to amend title 28 of the United States Code to restrict how Presidents, Vice Presidents, and certain related individuals receive payments from the United States. It creates a ban on "covered individuals" recovering damages, settlements, or attorney's fees through administrative claims or settlements. For civil actions, the bill limits awards to actual or compensatory damages and requires the appointment of independent counsel to represent the defending agency. It also establishes specific guardrails and transparency requirements for claims made by former officials. Finally, the bill sets forth penalties for violations and establishes a statute of limitations for enforcement.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The bill mandates that court filings and audio of proceedings be made available online for free and requires publication of payment details in the Federal Register.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+3
The bill restricts the ability of high-level officials to recover settlements and attorney's fees from the government.
The opposite
Would high-income households be better off under this?-5
The bill specifically targets the ability of high-ranking officials and their families to recover significant legal payments.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-4
The bill restricts damage awards to actual or compensatory damages and requires the appointment of independent counsel for the defending agency.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Transparency: The bill requires that in certain civil actions, the court must make all filings and proceedings available online for free, including audio of court sessions (Section 1(e)(f)).
-
Heightened Accountability for Former Officials: For former covered individuals seeking payments, the bill requires that the terms of any agreement and the specific details of any payment be published in the Federal Register within 7 days (Section 1(g)(3)-(4)).
-
Congressional Oversight: The bill mandates that agencies submit copies of claims and any resulting approvals or denials to the appropriate congressional committees (Section 1(g)(5)).
-
Reduced Conflict of Interest for Former Officials: The bill prohibits executive branch employees or officials appointed by a covered individual from participating in the review or adjudication of a claim against the United States (Section 1(g)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Restrictions on Damage Awards: The bill prevents courts from awarding anything other than actual or compensatory damages to covered individuals in civil actions against the United States (Section 1(e)(1)).
-
Barriers to Legal Recovery: "Covered individuals" are prohibited from recovering damages, reimbursements, or attorney's fees through settlement agreements, consent decrees, or administrative resolutions (Section 1(b)).
-
Additional Legal Requirements and Costs: To receive actual or compensatory damages in a civil action, a covered individual must agree to the court-appointed independent counsel to represent the agency defending the claim (Section 1(e)(2)(A)).
-
Severe Penalties for Violations: Covered individuals who willfully violate the ban on obtaining payments or knowingly file administrative claims face penalties including the loss of the payment, civil penalties up to $1,000,000 (or the aggregate amount of the payments), and up to 5 years in prison (Section 1(h)(1)).
-
Penalties for Government Employees: Any individual who willfully causes a department or agency to process a prohibited claim can face civil penalties up to $50,000 and up to 6 months in prison (Section 1(h)(2)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For High Income Households-5
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5Improves Due Process-4
- 4/28/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Donald BeyerDemocrat · Virginia
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Johnny OlszewskiDemocrat · Maryland
Bradley SchneiderDemocrat · Illinois