Bill · H.R. 7863· House(119-HR-7863)
Promoting Fairness for Medicare Providers Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 3/9/2026
- Last activity
- 3/9/2026 — Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Gus Bilirakis
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 2
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Promoting Fairness for Medicare Providers Act of 2026 aims to amend the Social Security Act regarding Medicare payments. It focuses on aligning payment for specific high-cost surgical procedures when they are performed in office-based facilities. The bill establishes new rules for how these procedures are compensated starting in 2027. It distinguishes between standard office visits and these specific high-supply cost procedures. Additionally, it sets standards for what qualifies as an office-based facility. The legislation also includes provisions for annual reviews of which procedures fall under this new category.
Yes· 3 of 10
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+5
The bill caps out-of-pocket coinsurance for Medicare beneficiaries undergoing specific surgical procedures in office settings.
Would retired people be better off under this?+5
The bill limits the maximum coinsurance amount for specified high-supply cost surgical procedures to the inpatient hospital deductible.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+4
The bill limits the financial burden of high-cost surgical procedures for Medicare recipients.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Limits out-of-pocket costs for patients: For individuals receiving specified high supply cost surgical procedures in an office-based facility, the amount of coinsurance for facility services cannot exceed the inpatient hospital deductible amount. (Section 2(a)(2)(3)(A))
-
Provides specific payment structures for high-cost procedures: The bill establishes that payment for these specific procedures in an office-based facility will be determined in a manner similar to how they are paid for in an ambulatory surgical center. (Section 2(a)(2)(1))
-
Ensures payment to providers when patient costs are capped: If a patient's required coinsurance would normally exceed the inpatient hospital deductible due to the new cap, the Secretary must increase the amount paid to the office-based facility to cover the difference. (Section 2(a)(2)(3)(B))
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Requires specific agreements from physician offices: To qualify as an "office-based facility" under this act, a physician's office must enter into an agreement with the Secretary to accept the determined payment amount as full payment and accept assignment for all such facility services. (Section 2(a)(2)(5)(B))
-
Subjects offices to specific health and safety standards: Physician offices acting as office-based facilities must meet health, safety, and other standards specified by the Secretary in regulations. (Section 2(a)(2)(5)(A))
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Retirees+5Good For Seniors+5Good For Low Income Households+4Good For Middle Class Households+4Good For Veterans+4
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+4Increases Medicare Funding+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+2Improves Fiscal Responsibility+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+1
- 3/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/9/2026
- Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
John JoyceRepublican · Pennsylvania
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Raul RuizDemocrat · California