Bill · H.R. 7836· House(119-HR-7836)
Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 3/5/2026
- Last activity
- 3/5/2026 — Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Zoe Lofgren
- Cosponsors
- - 15 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Real Courts, Rule of Law Act of 2026," proposes the creation of the United States Immigration Courts as an independent court of record under article I of the Constitution. The system would consist of an appellate division, a trial division, and an administrative division. It establishes specific appointment processes, 15-year terms for judges, and a structured hierarchy including chief judges. The act also outlines jurisdiction for both trial and appellate divisions, establishes salary standards, and defines retirement and removal protocols. Furthermore, it provides mechanisms for temporary judges and facilities to handle caseload needs.
Yes
Would immigrants be better off under this?+7
The bill benefits immigrants by establishing an independent judiciary, providing legal orientation, and ensuring access to qualified interpreters.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+6
The bill enhances due process by establishing an independent immigration court system with standardized judicial qualifications and legal orientation programs.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+5
The bill provides financial hardship protections by allowing for the waiver of court fees.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Judicial Independence: The bill establishes that the Immigration Courts shall not be an agency of, and shall be independent of, the executive branch of the Government (Section 2(a)(1)).
-
Standardized Judge Qualifications: Judges must be members of the bar for at least 10 years and possess a reputation for integrity, good character, and a commitment to equal justice (Section 602(a)).
-
Protection Against Political Bias: The act directs that candidates for immigration judges be selected without regard to political party affiliation or perceived political ideology (Section 602(b)(3)).
-
Diverse Candidate Identification: The President and appellate division are tasked with ensuring qualified candidates are identified without regard to race, color, sex, religion, or other protected factors (Section 602(b)(1)).
-
Support for Indigent Individuals: The administrative council is required to evaluate the availability of legal services for indigent and non-English speaking individuals when determining court locations (Section 2(a)(3)(B)(i)(II)).
-
Access to Representation: The bill preserves the privilege of being represented by counsel of a person's choosing at no expense to the Government (Section s 623(a)).
-
Provision of Interpreters: The courts are required to establish a program to ensure the use of qualified interpreters in proceedings (Section 623(b)).
-
Clear Legal Information: The courts must maintain a legal orientation program to explain procedures and provide basic legal information to individuals (Section 623(c)).
-
Fee Waivers: Rules for court fees must include procedures to allow for waivers in cases of financial hardship (Section 622(c)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Terms of Service and Appointment: Immigration appeals judges and trial judges are appointed for 15-year terms, which may impact the continuity of specific judicial philosophies over time (Section 2(b)(2) and Section 2(c)(2)).
-
Potential for Temporary Disruptions: The appellate division has the authority to appoint temporary trial judges and establish temporary facilities based on specific and credible facts (Section 603(a)).
-
Financial Burdens for Fees: While waivers are mentioned, the appellate division is authorized to prescribe rules for the collection of reasonable filing fees and other fees (Section 622(c)(1)).
-
Mandatory Removal for Certain Actions: An immigration judge may be removed from office for specific causes such as misconduct or neglect of duty (Section 602(f)(1)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants+7Good For Low Income Households+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+6
- 10/5/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/16/2026
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 8/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/21/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/2/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 5/11/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/5/2026
- Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
André CarsonDemocrat · Indiana
J. CorreaDemocrat · California
Mark DeSaulnierDemocrat · California
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
George LatimerDemocrat · New York
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Jamie RaskinDemocrat · Maryland
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Mary Gay ScanlonDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas