Bill · H.R. 7687· House(119-HR-7687)
No Tax on Takings Act
- Introduced
- 2/25/2026
- Last activity
- 2/25/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Sponsored by
- Ben Cline
- Cosponsors
- - 10 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "No Tax on Takings Act," proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. It aims to exclude gain from gross income when property located in the United States is converted due to the exercise of eminent domain. This exclusion also covers property sold or exchanged under the threat or imminence of eminent domain. The act specifies that Section 1033 will not apply to these specific conversions. Taxpayers have the option to elect not to use this exclusion. These changes would apply to conversions in taxable years ending after the Act is enacted.
Yes· 3 of 12
Does this cut the tax on profits from selling investments?+5
The bill effectively reduces the tax burden on capital gains realized through property conversion via eminent domain.
Would farmers be better off under this?+4
Farmers whose land is frequently subject to eminent domain for infrastructure will see improved financial outcomes.
Would high-income households be better off under this?+3
High-income property owners can utilize this exclusion to mitigate significant tax liabilities from eminent domain.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government owes?-1
By excluding certain gains from gross income, the bill may slightly reduce federal tax revenue.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Tax Exclusion on Property Conversion: Gross income would not include gains from the conversion of property in the U.S. due to eminent domain, including property sold or exchanged under the threat of such action (Section 2(a)). This could benefit property owners by preventing them from paying taxes on gains resulting from the government's exercise of eminent domain.
-
Flexibility for Taxpayers: Taxpayers have the choice to elect not to claim the exclusion (Section 2(a)(c)). This provides individuals with control over whether they want to apply this specific rule to their conversion.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are explicitly detailed in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Farmers+4Good For Billionaires+3Good For Business Owners+3Good For High Income Households+3Good For High Net Worth Individuals+3Good For Rural Residents+3Good For Ultra High Net Worth Individuals+3Good For Middle Class Households+2
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Capital Gains Tax+5Improves Small Business Support+3Reduces Middle Class Taxes+3Reduces Small Business Taxes+3Reduces National Debt-1
- 9/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/6/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/25/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Sheri BiggsRepublican · South Carolina
James ComerRepublican · Kentucky
Charles FleischmannRepublican · Tennessee
Craig GoldmanRepublican · Texas
Jeff HurdRepublican · Colorado
Tracey MannRepublican · Kansas
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
Scott PerryRepublican · Pennsylvania
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio