Bill · H.R. 7392· House(119-HR-7392)
To impose a hiring freeze on United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and for other purposes.
- Introduced
- 2/5/2026
- Last activity
- 2/6/2026 — Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
- Sponsored by
- Lizzie Fletcher
- Cosponsors
- - 27 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill aims to impose a hiring freeze on United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Under this measure, no Federal funds can be used to appoint new individuals to positions within the agency. Additionally, the bill prohibits the detailing or transferring of any Federal employee to the agency. This freeze begins on the date the section is enacted. The freeze remains in effect until Congress passes a new law to supersede or modify it.
Yes
Would immigrants be better off under this?+3
The hiring freeze on ICE may reduce the agency's capacity for enforcement actions against immigrants.
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?+2
A reduction in ICE staffing and operations may decrease the frequency of immigration enforcement actions often affecting Hispanic communities.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+2
The bill limits federal spending by prohibiting the obligation of funds for new appointments or employee transfers within ICE.
The opposite
Does this tighten control of the border?-3
The hiring freeze on ICE personnel may impact the agency's capacity to conduct border and immigration enforcement operations.
Does this give the federal government more power?-1
The bill uses federal legislative authority to restrict the operational capacity of a federal agency.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Financial Control: The bill prevents the obligation or expenditure of Federal funds for new appointments or employee transfers within United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as stated in Section 1(a).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Staffing Limitations: The bill prevents the agency from appointing new individuals or transferring current Federal employees to United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as stated in Section 1(a).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants+3Good For Hispanic Americans+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Border Security-3
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending+2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power-1
- 9/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/31/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/12/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/25/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/9/2026
- 9 Cosponsors added.
- 2/6/2026
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement.
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations, and Accountability.
- 2/5/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.
- 10 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Yvette ClarkeDemocrat · New York
Jasmine CrockettDemocrat · Texas
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Madeleine DeanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Veronica EscobarDemocrat · Texas
Lois FrankelDemocrat · Florida
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
Al GreenDemocrat · Texas
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
Daniel GoldmanDemocrat · New York
Chrissy HoulahanDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Sara JacobsDemocrat · California
Robin KellyDemocrat · Illinois
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Timothy KennedyDemocrat · New York
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Raul RuizDemocrat · California
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Darren SotoDemocrat · Florida
Norma TorresDemocrat · California
Lori TrahanDemocrat · Massachusetts
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Marc VeaseyDemocrat · Texas