Bill · H.R. 7046· House(119-HR-7046)
Qualified Immunity Abolition Act of 2026
- Introduced
- 1/13/2026
- Last activity
- 1/13/2026 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Ayanna Pressley
- Cosponsors
- - 14 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Qualified Immunity Abolition Act of 2026," aims to amend the Revised Statutes. The primary purpose is to remove the defense of qualified immunity for actions brought against law enforcement officers. This change would apply to Federal, State, or local law enforcement officers. It specifically targets actions regarding whether an officer acted in good faith or believed their conduct was lawful. Additionally, the bill expands section 1979 to include Federal law enforcement officers acting under federal authority.
Yes· 3 of 7
Does this change how police departments operate?+7
The bill removes the qualified immunity defense, increasing accountability for law enforcement officers' conduct.
Would Black Americans be better off under this?+5
Removing qualified immunity provides a mechanism to hold officers accountable for potential civil rights violations.
Would Hispanic Americans be better off under this?+5
The abolition of qualified immunity provides a legal avenue for challenging law enforcement conduct.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Removal of Qualified Immunity Defense: By amending Section 1979, the bill ensures that certain previous defenses cannot be used by Federal, State, or local law enforcement officers in legal actions (Section 2). This could allow individuals to pursue legal action regardless of whether the officer acted in good faith or believed their conduct was lawful.
-
Expanded Scope for Federal Officers: The bill amends the law to include every Federal law enforcement officer acting under color of statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of the United States (Section 3). This ensures that the legal provisions apply to these specific federal officers.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For African Americans+5Good For Hispanic Americans+5Good For Low Income Households+3Good For People With Disabilities+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Policing Reform+7Improves Racial Equity+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+4
- 3/24/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/2/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 1/22/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/14/2026
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 1/13/2026
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
- 1/12/2026
- Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H649)
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Maxwell FrostDemocrat · Florida
Al GreenDemocrat · Texas
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Robin KellyDemocrat · Illinois
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan
Nikema WilliamsDemocrat · Georgia
Bonnie Watson ColemanDemocrat · New Jersey