Bill · H.R. 6751· House(119-HR-6751)
Sunset for the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Act
- Introduced
- 12/16/2025
- Last activity
- 12/16/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Pramila Jayapal
- Cosponsors
- - 15 - 3
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
H.R. 6751, known as the "Sunset for the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force Act," aims to repeal Public Law 107-40. Congress finds that the original law has been used to justify a broad and open-ended authorization for military force. This interpretation is viewed as inconsistent with the authority of Congress to declare war. The repeal would take effect 240 days after the Act is enacted.
Yes· 3 of 5
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
Restoring the need for congressional approval for war increases government transparency and accountability.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+5
Limiting open-ended military authority reduces the risk of detention without due process.
Does this protect people from being watched or searched?+4
Repealing the AUMF may reduce the legal justification for invasive surveillance.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-7
The bill explicitly aims to reduce executive power by repealing an open-ended military authorization.
Does this give the government more power to monitor people inside the country?-5
Repealing the AUMF likely limits the legal basis for broad military and intelligence surveillance operations.
Does this put more money into stopping terrorism?-2
Repealing the AUMF removes the primary legal justification for many current counter-terrorism operations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Restoring Congressional Authority: Section 2 suggests that repealing the law addresses the inconsistency with the authority of Congress to declare war and make laws for executing government powers.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts for individuals or groups are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+5Improves Government Transparency+5Improves Privacy Rights+4Increases Federal Power-7
- National Security And Foreign Policy
- Improves Diplomatic Engagement+3Reduces Military Spending+2Increases Domestic Surveillance-5Increases Counter Terrorism Funding-2
- 9/14/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2026
- 11 Cosponsors added.
- 12/16/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Brendan BoyleDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Everton BlairDemocrat · Georgia
Greg CasarDemocrat · Texas
Elijah CraneRepublican · Arizona
Rosa DeLauroDemocrat · Connecticut
Valerie FousheeDemocrat · North Carolina
John GaramendiDemocrat · California
H. GriffithRepublican · Virginia
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
James McGovernDemocrat · Massachusetts
Thomas MassieRepublican · Kentucky
Sarah McBrideDemocrat · Delaware
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Jerrold NadlerDemocrat · New York
Ilhan OmarDemocrat · Minnesota
Ayanna PressleyDemocrat · Massachusetts
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Maxine WatersDemocrat · California