Bill · H.R. 6724· House(119-HR-6724)
Protecting Supplemental Security Income for Disaster Victims Act
- Introduced
- 12/15/2025
- Last activity
- 12/15/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Sponsored by
- Michael Rulli
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 2
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Protecting Supplemental Security Income for Disaster Victims Act. It amends title XVI of the Social Security Act to make sure Supplemental Security Income payments stay stable. Specifically, it tells the government to ignore certain settlement money when figuring out who qualifies for benefits. This includes money received for personal injury, physical sickness, or property damage. It specifically mentions settlements from the East Palestine train derailment case. These rules apply to benefits for months starting on or after the enactment date, and for the specific train derailment settlement, it even applies to months before the enactment date.
Yes· 3 of 9
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+8
The bill directly safeguards low-income individuals receiving SSI from losing their benefits due to receiving disaster or personal injury settlements.
Would people with disabilities be better off under this?+8
Supplemental Security Income is a primary support program for individuals with disabilities, making this bill highly beneficial for them.
Does this strengthen Social Security?+8
The bill protects Supplemental Security Income beneficiaries by ensuring certain disaster and personal injury settlements are excluded from income and resource calculations.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2(a): This part ignores certain settlement amounts, like those for personal injury, physical sickness, or property damage, when counting a person's income. This is positive because it means people receiving Supplemental Security Income can accept settlement money from events like the East Palestine train derailment without risking the loss of their regular benefit payments due to counted income.
-
Section 2(b): This part ignores those same settlement amounts when counting a person's resources for the month they receive it and every month after. This is helpful because it protects individuals and spouses from losing their benefits because a settlement pushes them over the resource limit allowed for the program.
-
Section 2(c): This provision makes these new rules apply to benefits payable for months starting on or after the enactment date, and specifically applies to the East Palestine train derailment settlement for months before the enactment date. This is a positive benefit because it provides retroactive protection for past months regarding that specific train derailment settlement.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any sections or provisions that outline potential negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+8Good For People With Disabilities+8Good For Seniors+6Good For Retirees+5Good For Rural Residents+5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Social Security+8Improves Poverty Reduction+5
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Disaster Relief And F E M A+6Improves Rural Development+3
- 3/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/16/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/15/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
John MannionDemocrat · New York