Bill · H.R. 6685· House(119-HR-6685)
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish an exception for multiemployer plan participants to the requirements for automatic enrollment.
- Introduced
- 12/12/2025
- Last activity
- 12/12/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- Sponsored by
- Brad Finstad
- Cosponsors
- - 9 - 8
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The goal is to establish an exception for multiemployer plan participants regarding the requirements for automatic enrollment. It modifies Section 414A(c)(3) to include multiemployer plans alongside church plans. These changes would take effect for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
Yes· 3 of 6
Would union members be better off under this?+4
The bill specifically accommodates the administrative structure of multiemployer plans frequently used by union members.
Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise?+3
By exempting multiemployer plans from automatic enrollment requirements, the bill provides greater flexibility to union-managed benefit structures.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+2
The bill affects the administration of multiemployer plans which are critical for retirement income for older workers.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Exception for multiemployer plans: The bill adds multiemployer plans to the existing exceptions for automatic enrollment requirements found in Section 414A(c)(3). This provides a specific exception for participants in these types of plans.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated: The provided text does not contain any details regarding potential negative consequences or burdens resulting from these amendments.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Union Workers+4Good For Middle Class Households+2Good For Retirees+2Good For Seniors+2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Union Protections+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Social Security+1
- 8/17/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/30/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/27/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/14/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 3/3/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/2/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/7/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/12/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Brendan BoyleDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Mike CareyRepublican · Ohio
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Michelle FischbachRepublican · Minnesota
John LarsonDemocrat · Connecticut
Nicole MalliotakisRepublican · New York
Kelly MorrisonDemocrat · Minnesota
Michael RulliRepublican · Ohio
Linda SánchezDemocrat · California
Marilyn StricklandDemocrat · Washington
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Bryan SteilRepublican · Wisconsin
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York
Tony WiedRepublican · Wisconsin