Bill · H.R. 6380· House(119-HR-6380)
Chiricahua National Park Act
- Introduced
- 12/3/2025
- Last activity
- 9/30/2026 — Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5226)
- Sponsored by
- Juan Ciscomani
- Cosponsors
- - 0 - 1
- Introduced
- Passed House
- Passed Senate
What this bill would do
Yes· 3 of 9
Would Native Americans be better off under this?+8
Provides explicit protections for cultural/religious sites and guarantees access for tribal members.
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?+5
Redesignates the area as a National Park and mandates the protection of cultural and religious sites.
Does this protect the freedom to practise a religion?+5
Ensures the protection and access to traditional religious sites for tribal members.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Native Americans+8Good For Rural Residents+3Good For Business Owners+2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Public Land Management+5Improves Environmental Protections+4Improves Rural Development+2
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Religious Freedom+5Improves Racial Equity+3
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+2
- Enrolled Bill
The final version, on its way to the President
- 9/30/2026
- Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources discharged by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed/agreed to in Senate: Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent.
- Passed Senate without amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5226)
- 7/29/2026
- Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
- 3/17/2026
- Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
- 3/16/2026
- The title of the measure was amended. Agreed to without objection.
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2525)
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H2525)
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6380.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2525-2527)
- Mr. Wittman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.
- 3/12/2026
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-543.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 467.
- 3/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/11/2026
- Subcommittee on Federal Lands Discharged
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
- 12/11/2025
- Subcommittee Hearings Held
- 12/4/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands.
- 12/3/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Greg StantonDemocrat · Arizona