Bill · H.R. 6329· House(119-HR-6329)
Information Quality Assurance Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 12/1/2025
- Last activity
- 2/25/2026 — Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- Sponsored by
- Lisa McClain
- Cosponsors
- - 0 - 1
- Introduced
- Passed House
- In Senate committee
What this bill would do
The Information Quality Assurance Act of 2025 seeks to ensure Federal agencies use the best available scientific, technical, economic, and other information when creating or sharing rules and guidance. It directs the Director to update guidelines to maximize the quality, objectivity, and integrity of influential information. Federal agencies will be required to update their own guidelines to ensure they rely on fit-for-purpose information. The bill also mandates the public disclosure of critical factual material used in the rulemaking process. It includes provisions for public notice and comment regarding this factual material. Finally, it aims to increase transparency through the use of open Government data assets.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The bill mandates the public disclosure of critical factual material used in agency rulemaking to increase transparency.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
- The House: a fast-track vote, needing two-thirds to passPassed 362–1
The House sets aside its normal procedure to move quickly: no amendments, little debate, and a two-thirds bar instead of a simple majority. It is used for measures expected to be uncontroversial, so a bill that fails here failed despite broad expectations that it would not.
02/24/2026 · Roll call 71 · recorded as “On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass”
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Transparency of Agency Decisions: The bill requires agencies to make the critical factual material used for rules and guidance available in a rulemaking docket or public administrative record (Section 2(c)(1)(A)). This allows the public to see exactly what information the government is relying on.
-
Improved Access to Information: Agencies are directed to provide notice and an opportunity for the public to comment on critical factual material used in notice and comment rulemaking (Section 2(c)(1)(B)(ii)). Additionally, agencies are instructed to make critical factual material available as an open Government data asset (Section 2(c)(3)(A)).
-
Higher Quality Federal Guidance: The act mandates that agencies update guidelines to ensure they rely on the "best reasonably available information and evidence that is fit-for-purpose" (Section 2(b)(1)). This is intended to maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of influential information (Section 2(a)(1)(A)).
-
Accountability for Information Accuracy: The bill requires agencies to ensure administrative mechanisms are available for seeking and obtaining the correction of influential information or evidence that does not comply with updated guidelines (Section 2(b)(3)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Potential Costs to the Government: The directive to implement public disclosure requirements is to be done "to the maximum extent feasible, considering costs to the Federal Government" (Section 2(c)(2)(A)(ii)). This suggests that cost limitations may influence how much information is actually shared.
-
Limited Information Access: There are exceptions where information may not be made available in a rulemaking docket or administrative record, such as when information is prohibited from being disclosed by statute (Section 2(c)(2)(A)(iii)).
-
Lack of Funding: The act explicitly states that "no additional funds are authorized to be appropriated" for the purpose of carrying out the act or its amendments (Section 2(c)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5
- 2/25/2026
- Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
- 2/24/2026
- Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
- Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 362 - 1 (Roll no. 71).
- On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: (2/3 required): 362 - 1 (Roll no. 71).
- Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H2276-2277)
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 2/23/2026
- At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 8, rule XX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed.
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6329.
- Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H2245-2247; text: CR H2245-2246)
- Mr. Timmons moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.
- 12/2/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 43 - 0.
- 12/1/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Introduced in House
Lateefah SimonDemocrat · California