Bill · H.R. 6221· House(119-HR-6221)
Fostering the Future for American Children and Families Act
- Introduced
- 11/20/2025
- Last activity
- 11/20/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Zachary Nunn
- Cosponsors
- - 3 - 2
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Fostering the Future for American Children and Families Act. It requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Secretary of Labor to study existing programs that support job training and apprenticeships for foster youth. The bill also requires these officials to submit a report of their findings and recommendations to Congress within one year. After the study is complete, the bill establishes the Fostering the Future Pipeline Program to provide competitive grants for expanding job training access. Additionally, the bill allows certain education and training vouchers to be used for short-term, career-focused, credential-granting programs. The Act and its amendments take effect six months after enactment.
Yes· 3 of 13
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+8
Young adults aging out of the foster care system benefit significantly from increased training voucher flexibility and job pipelines.
Would children be better off under this?+7
The legislation directly targets current and former foster youth by expanding their career and educational opportunities.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+6
Foster youth transitioning to adulthood frequently come from low-income backgrounds and benefit from targeted financial and career support.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 2: This section requires a comprehensive study on programs supporting technical job training, on-the-job training, and apprenticeships for current and former foster youth. This might be considered positive because it evaluates program effectiveness, service gaps, access barriers, and opportunities to expand career pathways.
-
Section 3: This section establishes the Fostering the Future Pipeline Program to make grants to States, academic institutions, private-sector employers, and nonprofit or faith-based organizations. This is positive because it aims to expand access to industry-aligned technical job training and apprenticeships in high-demand fields like skilled trades, manufacturing, health care, information technology, and agriculture.
-
Section 4: This section amends the Social Security Act to make education and training vouchers available for short-term, career-focused, credential-granting programs, including registered apprenticeships, certificate programs, and other rapid-employment pathways. This is positive because it increases flexibility for youth exiting foster care.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No potential negative impacts or burdens for individuals or groups of people are explicitly found within the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Young Adults+8Good For Children+7Good For Low Income Households+6Good For Students+6Good For Business Owners+4Good For Farmers+2
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+5Improves Economic Growth+3Improves Small Business Support+3
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+6Reduces Homelessness+4
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+4Increases Federal Power+2
- 2/3/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/20/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Don BaconRepublican · Nebraska
Vince FongRepublican · California
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Greg LandsmanDemocrat · Ohio
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia