Bill · H.R. 5600· House(119-HR-5600)
SPEED and Reliability Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 9/26/2025
- Last activity
- 9/26/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- Sponsored by
- Scott Peters
- Cosponsors
- - 2 - 3
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "SPEED and Reliability Act of 2025," seeks to amend the Federal Power Act to streamline the process of siting transmission facilities. It establishes new definitions for terms such as "improved reliability" and "landowner input" to assist the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The Act modifies requirements for issuing construction or modification permits for electric transmission facilities deemed necessary in the national interest. It also updates rules regarding state siting authority, cost allocation for tariffs, and the coordination of federal authorizations. Additionally, it clarifies the jurisdiction of the Commission over various utilities.
Yes· 3 of 6
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+3
The bill requires that cost allocation for transmission facilities be just and reasonable and protects customers who receive no or trivial benefits.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+2
The bill aims to improve energy reliability and reduce unserved energy through enhanced transmission capabilities.
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+2
The bill requires the Commission to afford interested persons a reasonable opportunity to present their views and recommendations.
The opposite
Would farmers be better off under this?-2
While the bill requires consultation, it primarily seeks to streamline the siting of transmission facilities through land used by farmers and ranchers.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Improved Reliability: The bill defines "improved reliability" to include benefits such as a reduction in expected unserved energy, loss of load hours, or loss of load probability (Section 2(a)(3)).
-
Consumer Protections: The Commission is required to ensure that tariffs or tariff revisions are just and reasonable, allocating costs to customers that benefit from improved reliability, reduced congestion, or reduced power losses (Section 2(e)(2)).
-
Ratepayer Protections: Customers who receive no benefit, or benefits that are trivial in relation to the costs, shall not be involuntarily allocated any costs of the transmission facilities (Section 2(e)(3)).
-
Energy Independence: The bill directs that proposed construction or modification must be consistent with sound national energy policy and enhance energy independence (Section 2(b)(5)).
-
Enhanced Transmission Capabilities: The bill encourages maximizing the transmission capabilities of existing towers, structures, or rights-of-way where reasonable and economical (Section 2(b)(7)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Impact on Landowners: While the bill requires the Commission to take into account "landowner input," which includes notification and consultation with affected farmers and ranchers, the primary focus is on streamlining the siting of facilities (Section 2(a)(4) and Section 2(c)(3)).
-
Cost Allocation Obligations: Transmitting utilities are required to file tariffs or tariff revisions to allocate the costs of new or modified transmission facilities (Section 2(e)(1)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+2Good For Low Income Households+1Good For Middle Class Households+1Good For Farmers-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+1
- 6/15/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 4/6/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 9/26/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Andy BarrRepublican · Kentucky
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Dusty JohnsonRepublican · South Dakota
Kristen McDonald RivetDemocrat · Michigan
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia