Bill · H.R. 5596· House(119-HR-5596)
FARMS Act
- Introduced
- 9/26/2025
- Last activity
- 9/26/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- John Moolenaar
- Cosponsors
- - 12 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Freeze AEWR and Restore Monetary Sense Act" or the "FARMS Act," focuses on the adverse effect wage rate. It authorizes the Secretary of Labor to keep the current wage rate in place for a period of two years. This action can be taken if the Secretary determines that a valid method to calculate a new rate does not exist. The provision specifically applies to nonimmigrants admitted under section 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Yes
Does this give the federal government more power?+1
The bill grants the Secretary of Labor specific discretionary authority regarding wage rate calculations.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?-2
By freezing the adverse effect wage rate, the bill may prevent wage growth for low-income nonimmigrant workers.
Would immigrants be better off under this?-2
The bill could lead to lower wages for certain nonimmigrant workers by freezing the required wage rate for two years.
Does this raise the lowest wage an employer may pay?-2
The bill allows the Secretary of Labor to freeze the adverse effect wage rate, which may prevent required wage increases for certain nonimmigrant workers.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Stability in wage requirements: The Secretary of Labor can retain the adverse effect wage rate that was in effect on the date of enactment for up to two years if a calculation method is unavailable (Section 2). This could provide certainty regarding required pay rates for certain nonimmigrants.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts are mentioned in the text: The provided text does not explicitly list any negative consequences or burdens that would result from the implementation of this bill.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Immigrants-2Good For Low Income Households-2
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Minimum Wage-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Pathway To Citizenship-1
- 10/31/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/30/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/26/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 9 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Robert AderholtRepublican · Alabama
Jack BergmanRepublican · Michigan
James BairdRepublican · Indiana
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
Michael GuestRepublican · Mississippi
Tony GonzalesRepublican · Texas
Bill HuizengaRepublican · Michigan
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Zachary NunnRepublican · Iowa
Elise StefanikRepublican · New York
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania
Claudia TenneyRepublican · New York