Bill · H.R. 5171· House(119-HR-5171)
Pacific Northwest Gray Wolves Relief Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 9/8/2025
- Last activity
- 9/8/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- Sponsored by
- Cliff Bentz
- Cosponsors
- - 3 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Pacific Northwest Gray Wolves Relief Act of 2025. It requires the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a specific final rule relating to gray wolves. This reissuance must happen not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this section. The rule that must be reissued is titled "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) From the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife". The reissued rule will apply only with respect to gray wolf populations in the States of Oregon and Washington.
Yes
Would farmers be better off under this?+5
The delisting of gray wolves provides agricultural producers and livestock owners in the Pacific Northwest with more options for managing livestock protection.
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+5
The legislation allows states greater management flexibility over gray wolf populations within Oregon and Washington.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+4
Rural residents and landowners gain increased local control and flexibility in managing wildlife issues on their properties.
The opposite
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-5
The bill removes gray wolves from the endangered species list in Washington and Oregon, which weakens wildlife conservation protections.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 2 requires the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a final rule that removes the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife for populations specifically in the States of Oregon and Washington. This might be considered positive because it carries out the specific reissuance directed by the bill for those states.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific details regarding negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Farmers+5Good For Rural Residents+4
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections-5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+5
- 6/15/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/16/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/8/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Michael BaumgartnerRepublican · Washington
Dan NewhouseRepublican · Washington
Michael SimpsonRepublican · Idaho