Bill · H.R. 513· House(119-HR-513)
Offshore Lands Authorities Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 1/16/2025
- Last activity
- 5/20/2025 — Subcommittee Hearings Held
- Sponsored by
- Clay Higgins
- Cosponsors
- - 25 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Offshore Lands Authorities Act of 2025 aims to nullify several specific Presidential withdrawals of unleased offshore land. It also amends the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to place strict limits on the President's authority to withdraw such lands. These limits include restrictions on the total acreage and duration of a withdrawal, as well as a cap on cumulative withdrawals. Additionally, the bill mandates specific geological and economic assessments before any withdrawal can occur. It also establishes an expedited congressional disapproval procedure for these actions.
Yes· 3 of 6
Would business owners be better off under this?+5
Energy and resource companies stand to benefit from the opening of offshore lands.
Is this likely to grow the economy?+4
By nullifying withdrawals, the bill potentially increases mineral resource availability and federal revenue.
Is this likely to create jobs?+3
Opening offshore areas for leasing may stimulate job growth in the energy sector.
The opposite· 3 of 6
Does this reduce how much oil, gas and coal is produced?-6
The bill actively works against restrictions on fossil fuel production by nullifying land withdrawals.
Does this cut the pollution that drives climate change?-5
By facilitating offshore oil and gas leasing, the bill may lead to increased carbon emissions.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-4
The bill reduces protections by nullifying previous withdrawals of environmentally sensitive areas.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Nullification of Previous Withdrawals: The bill voids several Presidential Memorandums and Executive Orders regarding offshore land, such as those relating to the Arctic, Atlantic coast, and Gulf of Mexico (Section 2). This could allow for the potential leasing of these areas.
-
Limits on Presidential Power: By establishing specific caps, the bill limits the amount of land a President can withdraw at once to 150,000 acres, prevents them from being contiguous, and limits the duration to 20 years (Section 3, paragraph 2).
-
Requirement for Data-Driven Decisions: The bill requires the Secretary to complete geophysical, geological, economic, and national security assessments before any withdrawal is made (Section s, paragraph 3). This ensures that the impacts on mineral resources and Federal revenues are understood first.
-
Increased Congressional Oversight: The bill mandates that the President must transmit withdrawal information to both the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House (Section 3, paragraph 1) and creates a specific process for Congress to disapprove of a withdrawal through a joint resolution (Section 3, paragraph 4).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Increased Bureaucracy and Requirements: Before a withdrawal can occur, several different assessments must be completed by the Secretary, including economic, energy, and national security value assessments (Section 3, paragraph 3).
-
Restrictions on Land Management: The new limits prevent the President from making withdrawals larger than 150,000 acres or keeping them in place for longer than 20 years (Section 3, paragraph 2).
-
Limitations on Cumulative Actions: The bill prohibits a President from withdrawing more than 500,000 acres in total without getting specific approval from Congress (Section 3, paragraph 2).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Reduces Gas Prices+2Reduces Fossil Fuel Production-6Reduces Carbon Emissions-5Improves Environmental Protections-4Improves Public Land Management-2
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Economic Growth+4Increases Job Creation+3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+5Good For Union Workers+2Good For Native Americans-3
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+3Increases Federal Power-3
- 5/20/2025
- Subcommittee Hearings Held
- 5/19/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/13/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources.
- 2/6/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/21/2025
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- 1/16/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 19 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Jodey ArringtonRepublican · Texas
Andy BiggsRepublican · Arizona
Troy BaldersonRepublican · Ohio
James BairdRepublican · Indiana
Tim BurchettRepublican · Tennessee
Eric BurlisonRepublican · Missouri
Josh BrecheenRepublican · Oklahoma
Andrew ClydeRepublican · Georgia
Dan CrenshawRepublican · Texas
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Wesley HuntRepublican · Texas
Harriet HagemanRepublican · Wyoming
Dusty JohnsonRepublican · South Dakota
Daniel MeuserRepublican · Pennsylvania
Carol MillerRepublican · West Virginia
Mary MillerRepublican · Illinois
Barry MooreRepublican · Alabama
Dan NewhouseRepublican · Washington
Andrew OglesRepublican · Tennessee
Scott PerryRepublican · Pennsylvania
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Jefferson ShreveRepublican · Indiana
Thomas TiffanyRepublican · Wisconsin
Beth Van DuyneRepublican · Texas
Randy WeberRepublican · Texas