Bill · H.R. 5085· House(119-HR-5085)
To exempt Federal actions related to the construction of infill housing from the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, and for other purposes.
- Introduced
- 9/2/2025
- Last activity
- 9/3/2025 — Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
- Sponsored by
- Laura Friedman
- Cosponsors
- - 9 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
H.R. 5085 exempts Federal actions related to infill housing from the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. The bill defines infill housing as residential housing on sites that are vacant or underutilized, previously developed with an urban use, no larger than 20 acres, and meeting specific surrounding development and environmental assessment criteria. It also ensures that these sites are not located in census tracts designated as very high or relatively high risk for wildfire, coastal flooding, and riverine flooding under FEMA's National Risk Index. Infill housing activities covered include acquiring land, demolishing non-historic structures, constructing or rehabilitating housing, and converting non-residential buildings. Additionally, the bill updates the requirement for natural hazard risk assessment updates from every 5 years to every 3 years.
Yes· 3 of 24
Does this make housing cost less?+6
The bill explicitly promotes and streamlines the construction and development of infill housing.
Would people in cities be better off under this?+5
The bill targets urban infill development, directly impacting urban residential infrastructure.
Would people in their twenties and thirties be better off under this?+4
Young adults often struggle with housing affordability and benefit from increased housing supply.
The opposite
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-2
Exempting infill housing federal actions from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reduces environmental review requirements.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Section 1(a) exempts Federal actions related to infill housing activities from being considered major Federal actions under section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, which could benefit individuals and groups by streamlining the process for developing residential housing on vacant or underutilized sites.
-
Section 1(b)(2)(A)(v) requires sites to undergo Phase I and, if necessary, Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, or be properly remediated, which can benefit people by ensuring that hazardous substances, pollutants, contaminants, or petroleum releases are checked and addressed before housing is built.
-
Section 1(b)(2)(B) ensures that infill housing sites are not located in census tracts designated as very high or relatively high risk for wildfire, coastal flooding, and riverine flooding, protecting individuals from building homes in areas identified with these specific natural hazard risks.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- The provided text does not contain any specific sections or provisions outlining negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups of people in the United States.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Urban Residents+5Good For Low Income Households+4Good For Middle Class Households+4Good For Young Adults+4Good For Business Owners+3Good For Children+2Good For Middle Aged+2Good For Seniors+2Good For Students+2Good For Union Workers+2Good For African Americans+1Good For High Income Households+1Good For Hispanic Americans+1Good For Immigrants+1Good For Retirees+1Good For Veterans+1Good For Women+1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Affordable Housing+6Reduces Homelessness+3
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+3Improves Economic Growth+2Improves Small Business Support+2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Disaster Relief And F E M A+2Reduces Carbon Emissions+2Improves Environmental Protections-2
- 8/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/11/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/3/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 9/3/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
- 9/2/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Jake AuchinclossDemocrat · Massachusetts
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Chuck EdwardsRepublican · North Carolina
Josh HarderDemocrat · California
Pablo HernándezDemocrat · Puerto Rico
Seth MoultonDemocrat · Massachusetts
Seth MagazinerDemocrat · Rhode Island
Scott PetersDemocrat · California
Thomas SuozziDemocrat · New York
Ritchie TorresDemocrat · New York