Bill · H.R. 4853· House(119-HR-4853)
Saving the Forest Service's Workforce Act
- Introduced
- 8/1/2025
- Last activity
- 8/1/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
- Sponsored by
- Jared Huffman
- Cosponsors
- - 7 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Saving the Forest Service's Workforce Act," aims to institute a reduction in force moratorium at the Forest Service. It prevents the Secretary of Agriculture from initiating or implementing any reduction in force until full-year appropriations for fiscal year 2026 are enacted into law. Additionally, it prohibits the involuntary separation of certain employees unless it is for cause due to misconduct, delinquency, or performance. This restriction applies to employees in the competitive service, career employees in the excepted service, and career appointees in the Senior Executive Service.
Yes· 3 of 5
Would union members be better off under this?+5
The bill protects workers from involuntary separation and maintains job security through a reduction in force moratorium.
Is this likely to create jobs?+2
By preventing a reduction in force, the bill helps maintain current employment levels at the Forest Service.
Would middle-income households be better off under this?+1
The bill provides job security for federal employees who are often middle-income earners.
The opposite
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-2
The moratorium prevents the government from reducing its payroll through layoffs or separations.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Job Security for Forest Service Employees: The bill prevents the Secretary of Agriculture from initiating or implementing a reduction in force until full-year appropriations for fiscal year 2026 are enacted into law (Section 2(a)). This provides stability for current workers.
-
Protection Against Involuntary Separation: The bill prohibits the involuntary separation of employees in the competitive service, career employees in the excepted service, or career appointees in the Senior Executive Service, except in specific cases of misconduct, delinquency, or performance (Section 2(a)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly mentioned in the provided text.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Union Workers+5Good For Middle Class Households+1
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Rural Development+1
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+1
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Job Creation+2Reduces Government Spending-2
- 8/1/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
- 7 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Yassamin AnsariDemocrat · Arizona
Maxine DexterDemocrat · Oregon
Sarah ElfrethDemocrat · Maryland
Val HoyleDemocrat · Oregon
Teresa Leger FernandezDemocrat · New Mexico
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon