Bill · H.R. 4559· House(119-HR-4559)
Prompt and Fair Pay Act
- Introduced
- 7/21/2025
- Last activity
- 7/21/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Lloyd Doggett
- Cosponsors
- - 3 - 4
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Prompt and Fair Pay Act" aims to change how Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations pay healthcare providers. It requires that payments for services provided to enrollees be at least equal to the amounts paid under the original Medicare fee-for-service program starting in 2027. Additionally, the bill establishes strict timelines for MA organizations to pay "clean claims" to in-network providers. If payments are late, the organizations must pay interest to the providers. The bill also mandates that MA organizations provide detailed notifications if a claim is rejected for being "unclean."
Yes· 3 of 7
Would business owners be better off under this?+6
Healthcare providers who own their practices benefit from higher and more prompt payments.
Does this make health care easier to get in general?+5
Payment parity encourages more providers to accept Medicare Advantage plans, increasing patient access.
Would people over 65 be better off under this?+4
Likely increases the network of providers available to seniors in Medicare Advantage plans.
The opposite
Does this lower what people pay for private health insurance?-2
Increased costs for MA organizations due to parity and interest payments may lead to higher premiums.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Provider Payment Parity: By requiring that MA organizations pay providers at least the same amount as original Medicare fee-for-service, the bill may help ensure providers are fairly compensated. This is found in Section 2.
-
Faster Payments to Providers: The bill requires "clean claims" to be paid within 14 days for electronic submissions and 30 days for other submissions, which ensures providers receive funds more quickly. This is found in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(iii).
-
Interest on Late Payments: Providers will receive interest on payments that are not issued within the required timeframe, providing a financial remedy for delays. This is found in Section 3(a)(1)(D)(i).
-
Better Transparency for Claim Denials: MA organizations must provide specific details on why a claim was not "clean" and give instructions on how to fix and resubmit it. This is found in Section 3(a)(1)(B)(iii).
-
Protection Against Retaliation: The bill prohibits MA organizations from retaliating against individuals, providers, or suppliers who exercise their legal rights under these provisions. This is found in Section 3(a)(1)(E)(ii).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Administrative Burden on MA Organizations: MA organizations must adhere to strict new notification timelines (10 to 15 days) to alert providers of claim deficiencies or the claim will be deemed "clean" and must be paid. This is found in Section 3(a)(1)(B)(ii).
-
Financial Penalties for MA Organizations: MA organizations face the burden of paying interest on late claims, which cannot be counted against the plan's administrative costs for medical loss ratio purposes. This is found in Section 3(a)(1)(D)(i).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners+6Good For Retirees+4Good For Seniors+4Good For Rural Residents+3
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Small Business Support+4
- Governance And Ideology
- Increases Federal Power+3
- Healthcare
- Improves Healthcare Access+5Reduces Private Insurance Premiums-2
- 4/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/23/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 10/31/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/21/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- Introduced in House
Chuck EdwardsRepublican · North Carolina
Andy HarrisRepublican · Maryland
Julie JohnsonDemocrat · Texas
Zoe LofgrenDemocrat · California
Gregory MurphyRepublican · North Carolina
Terri SewellDemocrat · Alabama
Glenn ThompsonRepublican · Pennsylvania