Bill · H.R. 3938· House(119-HR-3938)
CLASS Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 6/11/2025
- Last activity
- 6/11/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Maxine Waters
- Cosponsors
- - 12 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Court Legal Access and Student Support Act of 2025," aims to change how students can pursue legal claims. It would prevent the enforcement of arbitration agreements under chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States Code regarding enrollment agreements between students and institutions of higher education. The bill also prohibits institutions from requiring students to agree to limitations on their ability to pursue claims in court. These changes include restrictions on choice of law, jury trials, or venue. The Act takes effect one year after it is enacted.
Yes· 3 of 6
Would students be better off under this?+8
The bill significantly empowers students by guaranteeing their right to pursue legal claims in court.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?+7
The bill enhances due process for students by ensuring their right to pursue claims in a court of law.
Does this give people more protection from unfair business practices?+6
The bill strengthens consumer protections for students by preventing institutions from forcing them into mandatory arbitration.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-5
Higher education institutions may face increased litigation risks and costs due to the removal of arbitration requirements.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased ability to pursue legal claims: By amending the Higher Education Act of 1965, the bill prevents institutions from enforcing limitations or restrictions on a student's ability to pursue a claim, individually or with others, against the institution in court (Section 3).
-
Access to judicial proceedings: The bill prohibits institutions from requiring students to agree to restrictions on a jury trial or venue (Section 3).
-
Removal of arbitration requirements: The bill ensures that chapter 1 of title 9 of the United States Code, which relates to the enforcement of arbitration agreements, does not apply to enrollment agreements made between a student and an institution of higher education (Section 2(a)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No negative impacts are explicitly stated in the text provided.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Students+8Good For Low Income Households+5Good For Middle Class Households+5Good For Business Owners-5
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process+7Increases Federal Power+5
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+6
- 6/24/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/11/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 11 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Danny DavisDemocrat · Illinois
Cleo FieldsDemocrat · Louisiana
Jesús GarcíaDemocrat · Illinois
Robert GarciaDemocrat · California
Henry JohnsonDemocrat · Georgia
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Raja KrishnamoorthiDemocrat · Illinois
Summer LeeDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Delia RamirezDemocrat · Illinois
Janice SchakowskyDemocrat · Illinois
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan