RepublicanBill · H.R. 3853· House(119-HR-3853)

Federal Government Reform Act of 2025

Rep. Steube
Age: 48 years
Florida
Introduced
6/9/2025
Last activity
6/9/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Sponsored by
W. Steube
Cosponsors
None
Government Operations and Politics
  1. Introduced
  2. In Committee

What this bill would do

The Federal Government Reform Act of 2025 aims to modernize government operations and reduce regulatory overreach. It mandates the permanent closure of the Federal Executive Institute in Virginia. The bill establishes a one-year probationary period for various federal employees, requiring agency certification of their continued employment. Additionally, it seeks to reduce overcriminalization by restricting regulations that impose criminal penalties without statutory descriptions. The Act also directs the digitization of the Federal Register and the modernization of Treasury payment technologies. Finally, it establishes oversight through the Office of Management and Budget.

Yes· 3 of 4

  • Does this reduce what the federal government spends?+3

    The bill aims to reduce waste by closing the Federal Executive Institute and modernizing outdated systems.

  • Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+3

    The bill mandates digitizing the Federal Register and improving transparency of Treasury payments.

  • Does this make the government pay for what it commits to?+2

    The act focuses on eliminating wasteful bureaucracies and modernizing government efficiency.

The opposite· 3 of 4

  • Would union members be better off under this?-3

    The bill introduces mandatory probationary periods that could diminish long-term job security and union-style protections.

  • Does this strengthen the rights of workers to organise?-2

    The mandatory one-year probationary period and potential for separation without clear cause may weaken job security for federal employees.

  • Does this give the federal government more power?-2

    The requirement for mandatory probationary periods and agency certifications increases centralized control over federal personnel.