Bill · H.R. 3734· House(119-HR-3734)
Stop MUSK Act
- Introduced
- 6/4/2025
- Last activity
- 6/4/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- Sponsored by
- Patrick Ryan
- Cosponsors
- - 6 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled the "Stop Millionaires Using Service for Kickbacks Act," seeks to amend title 18 of the United States Code. It aims to change the rules regarding how executive branch officials handle potential conflicts of interest. Specifically, the bill targets officers and employees in certain positions, such as those on the Executive Schedule. The primary change requires these individuals to recuse themselves from matters affecting the financial interests of previous employers. This includes organizations where the individual served in various roles within a four-year period before their current position.
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+6
By mandating recusal, the bill increases transparency regarding potential conflicts of interest in executive decision-making.
Does this limit the influence of paid lobbyists?+5
The bill mitigates conflicts of interest which reduces the influence of former employers and lobbyists on current officials.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-3
The bill may impose restrictive recusal requirements on business owners who transition into executive government roles.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Accountability for High-Level Officials: By expanding the scope of who must recuse themselves to include those on the Executive Schedule and the Executive Office of the President, the bill targets specific high-level positions (Section 2).
-
Prevention of Conflicts with Previous Employers: The bill requires recusal from matters affecting organizations where an official served as an officer, director, trustee, partner, agent, attorney, consultant, contractor, or employee within the last four years (Section 2). This could prevent officials from using their current positions to benefit their former employers.
-
Broader Definition of Previous Affiliations: The inclusion of "direct competitors" and active participants in certain organizations as grounds for recusal expands the types of previous interests that must be avoided (Section 2).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Increased Recusal Requirements for Officials: The bill expands the criteria for what constitutes a conflict of interest, which would require officers, employees on the Executive Schedule, and those in the Executive Office of the President to recuse themselves from a wider range of matters (Section 2).
-
Broad Scope of Previous Employment Roles: The requirement to recuse applies to a very wide list of previous roles, including being an agent, attorney, consultant, contractor, or direct competitor, which could impact how officials manage their professional transitions (Section 2).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+6Reduces Lobbying+5
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Business Owners-3
- 7/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Joe NeguseDemocrat · Colorado
Hillary ScholtenDemocrat · Michigan
Emilia SykesDemocrat · Ohio