Bill · H.R. 3609· House(119-HR-3609)
Remove the Stain Act
- Introduced
- 5/23/2025
- Last activity
- 5/23/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- Sponsored by
- Jill Tokuda
- Cosponsors
- - 12 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The "Remove the Stain Act" aims to rescind every Medal of Honor awarded for actions occurring at Wounded Knee Creek on December 29, 1890. The bill notes that the 7th Cavalry participated in a massacre of unarmed Native Americans, including many women and children, during this event. According to the text, the event involved heavy destruction from army rifles and Hotchkiss cannons. The legislation requires the Secretary concerned to remove these names from the various military Medal of Honor Rolls. While the medals are rescinded, no person is required to return them to the Federal Government.
Yes
Would Native Americans be better off under this?+9
The bill honors the requests of Native American tribes by rescinding medals awarded during the Wounded Knee Massacre.
Does this narrow racial gaps in how people are treated?+8
The bill addresses historical injustices against Native Americans by rescinding medals awarded for a massacre.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Preserving the Integrity of the Award: The bill states that allowing the Medal of Honor to recognize participation in the massacre of unarmed individuals is a disservice to the integrity of the United States and its citizens, and impinges on the integrity of the award and those who have earned it since (Section 2, Finding 16).
-
Addressing Tribal Requests: The legislation responds to requests from the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, which requested the revocation of these medals in 2001, and the National Congress of American Indians, which requested in 2007 that Congress renounce the issuance of said medals (Section 2, Findings 13 and 14).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No Negative Impact on Benefits: The act specifically ensures that it shall not be construed to deny any individual any benefit from the Federal Government (Section 3, subsection d).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Native Americans+9
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity+8
- 1/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/3/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/23/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
- 6 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Angie CraigDemocrat · Minnesota
Sharice DavidsDemocrat · Kansas
Laura FriedmanDemocrat · California
Jared HuffmanDemocrat · California
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Betty McCollumDemocrat · Minnesota
Chellie PingreeDemocrat · Maine
Mike QuigleyDemocrat · Illinois
Emily RandallDemocrat · Washington
Melanie StansburyDemocrat · New Mexico
Rashida TlaibDemocrat · Michigan
Shri ThanedarDemocrat · Michigan