Bill · H.R. 3564· House(119-HR-3564)
The Nuclear First-Strike Security Act of 2025
- Introduced
- 5/21/2025
- Last activity
- 5/21/2025 — Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- Sponsored by
- Scott Peters
- Cosponsors
- - 25 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, titled "The Nuclear First-Strike Security Act of 2025," aims to limit how funds are used for first-use nuclear strikes. Under this act, the President must decide a strike is in the best interests of the United States. Additionally, the Secretary of Defense must submit a certification to several leaders in the House and Senate no more than 7 days before a strike occurs. Certain exceptions apply where this certification is not required, such as during a declaration of war or in response to a nuclear attack. The bill also defines terms like "ally of the United States" and "launch-on-warning scenario."
Yes
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?+5
The bill enhances transparency by requiring notification to congressional leadership before a first-use nuclear strike.
Does this give the federal government more power?+3
The bill imposes new notification and certification requirements on the President and Secretary of Defense, increasing legislative oversight of executive decisions.
The opposite
No question was scored the opposite.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased Congressional Oversight: By requiring the Secretary of Defense to submit a certification to leaders in both the House and Senate, the bill ensures that the legislative branch is notified of a potential first-use nuclear strike shortly before it occurs (Section 2(a)(2)).
-
Clear Definitions for Protection: The bill provides specific definitions for what constitutes a "nuclear attack" and "launch-on-warning scenario," which clarifies the circumstances under which the notification requirement is bypassed (Section 2(c)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Potential Delays in Communication: The requirement for the Secretary of Defense to submit a certification to various leaders in the House and Senate no more than 7 days before a strike could be a factor in how rapidly information is shared during a crisis (Section 2(a)(2)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Government Transparency+5Increases Federal Power+3
- 6/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/20/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2026
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 2/23/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 1/9/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/18/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 11/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/24/2025
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- 9/4/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 8/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 8/22/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 7/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/14/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 6/26/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/23/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/4/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 5/21/2025
- Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Ami BeraDemocrat · California
Nikki BudzinskiDemocrat · Illinois
Sean CastenDemocrat · Illinois
Christopher DeluzioDemocrat · Pennsylvania
Bill FosterDemocrat · Illinois
Maggie GoodlanderDemocrat · New Hampshire
Josh HarderDemocrat · California
Ro KhannaDemocrat · California
Susie LeeDemocrat · Nevada
Mike LevinDemocrat · California
Sam LiccardoDemocrat · California
John MannionDemocrat · New York
Kristen McDonald RivetDemocrat · Michigan
Dave MinDemocrat · California
Chris PappasDemocrat · New Hampshire
Patrick RyanDemocrat · New York
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
Eric SwalwellDemocrat · California
Eric SorensenDemocrat · Illinois
Suhas SubramanyamDemocrat · Virginia
Dina TitusDemocrat · Nevada
Derek TranDemocrat · California
Gabe VasquezDemocrat · New Mexico
Eugene VindmanDemocrat · Virginia
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California