Bill · H.R. 351· House(119-HR-351)
To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 to prohibit congestion or cordon pricing in a value pricing program, and for other purposes.
- Introduced
- 1/13/2025
- Last activity
- 1/14/2025 — Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
- Sponsored by
- Nicole Malliotakis
- Cosponsors
- - 1 - 1
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill seeks to amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. The primary goal is to prohibit specific types of pricing within value pricing programs. Specifically, it prevents the Secretary from establishing or maintaining programs that include congestion or cordon pricing. This change would modify the existing laws regarding transportation efficiency and value pricing.
Yes· 3 of 5
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+2
The bill protects low-income households from additional costs associated with congestion or cordon pricing.
Would middle-income households be better off under this?+2
The bill prevents middle-income commuters from being charged via congestion or cordon pricing programs.
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+2
The bill ensures that value pricing programs cannot include fees that might affect movement between regions.
The opposite
Does this improve buses, trains and other public transport?-2
By prohibiting congestion pricing, the bill removes a mechanism often used to fund and incentivize public transit usage.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Prevention of certain fees: The bill prohibits the Secretary from establishing or maintaining a value pricing program that includes congestion pricing or cordon pricing (Section 1). This would prevent these specific types of pricing from being implemented under the current framework.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- No specific negative impacts listed: The provided text does not contain information regarding potential negative consequences or burdens for individuals or groups.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+2Good For Middle Class Households+2Good For Rural Residents+2Good For Urban Residents+1
- Economy And Finance
- Improves Consumer Protection+2
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Public Transit-2
- 1/22/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 1/14/2025
- Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
- 1/13/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
- Introduced in House
Josh GottheimerDemocrat · New Jersey
Jefferson Van DrewRepublican · New Jersey