Bill · H.R. 281· House(119-HR-281)
Grizzly Bear State Management Act
- Introduced
- 1/9/2025
- Last activity
- 10/3/2025 — Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 281.
- Sponsored by
- Harriet Hageman
- Cosponsors
- - 4 - 0
- Introduced
- On Calendar
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Grizzly Bear State Management Act," directs the Secretary of the Interior to take specific action regarding grizzly bears. It requires the Secretary to reissue a final rule that removes the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife. This reissuance must occur within 180 days after the Act is enacted. The directive specifies that the rule be issued without regard to any other provision of law that applies to the issuance of that rule. Additionally, the bill states that the reissuance of this final rule is not subject to judicial review.
Yes
Would people in rural areas be better off under this?+5
Removing grizzly bear protections may facilitate more freedom for land use in rural areas like the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?+5
The bill aims to change how the Secretary manages the grizzly bear population within the ecosystem.
The opposite· 3 of 4
Does this make what the government does easier for the public to see?-5
The removal of judicial review reduces the transparency and accountability of the administrative process.
Does this protect the right to fair treatment by the courts?-5
The explicit removal of judicial review limits the due process available to challenge the rule.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?-5
Removing endangered status from grizzly bears may reduce federal protections for the species.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Removal of Federal Status: The bill directs the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a rule removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife (Section 2(a)). This change in status is the primary objective of the Act.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Lack of Oversight: The reissuance of the final rule, including the provisions within this section, shall not be subject to judicial review (Section 2(b)). This prevents the judicial branch from reviewing the action.
-
Legal Constraints Removed: The Secretary of the Interior is directed to reissue the rule without regard to any other provision of law that applies to the issuance of that final rule (Section 2(a)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Governance And Ideology
- Improves Due Process-5Improves Government Transparency-5Increases Federal Power-3
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Rural Residents+5
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Public Land Management+5Improves Environmental Protections-5
- 10/3/2025
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Natural Resources. H. Rept. 119-328.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 281.
- 7/15/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 20 - 19.
- 1/9/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Troy DowningRepublican · Montana
Russ FulcherRepublican · Idaho
Pete StauberRepublican · Minnesota
Ryan ZinkeRepublican · Montana