Bill · H.R. 2771· House(119-HR-2771)
Forest Legacy Management Flexibility Act
- Introduced
- 4/9/2025
- Last activity
- 4/9/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
- Sponsored by
- John Garamendi
- Cosponsors
- - 9 - 2
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
The Forest Legacy Management Flexibility Act aims to amend the Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978. This bill allows States to authorize specific organizations to acquire, hold, and manage conservation easements under the Forest Legacy Program. To be eligible, these organizations must demonstrate the ability to acquire, monitor, and enforce forestland interests. The bill also establishes specific conditions under which a conservation easement must revert to the State or another approved organization. Finally, it provides a specific definition for what constitutes a qualified organization.
Yes
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+6
The bill empowers states to authorize third-party organizations to manage conservation easements.
Does this better protect air, water and wildlife?+5
The bill enhances the management of forest conservation easements through increased state flexibility.
Does this better protect public land such as parks and forests?+5
It provides states more flexibility to use third-party organizations to manage forest conservation easements.
The opposite
Does this give the federal government more power?-2
The bill involves federal oversight of state-authorized organizations and easement reversion processes.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Increased flexibility for State management of conservation easements: Under Section 2(a)(3), the Secretary can authorize a State to approve eligible qualified organizations to carry out activities for the Forest Legacy Program.
-
Ensuring high standards for conservation organizations: Section 2(a)(n) requires that a qualified organization must have been operated principally for conservation purposes and must maintain accredited status from the Land Trust Accreditation Commission or a successor.
-
Protection against improper management: Section 2(a)(3)(4) establishes that if a qualified organization cannot carry out its responsibilities, or if the easement is modified inconsistently with program purposes, the interest in the easement will revert to the State or another approved organization.
-
Safeguards against organizations with legal issues: Section 2(a)(n)(3) ensures that organizations that have been the subject of criminal or civil enforcement actions regarding charitable donations of conservation easements are not considered qualified.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Loss of easement rights through reversion: Under Section 2(a)(3), an organization could lose all right, title, and interest in a conservation easement if certain conditions are met, such as being unable to carry out responsibilities or conveying the easement to an unapproved person.
-
Restrictions on easement modification: Section 2(a)(3)(4)(B) notes that a conservation easement may be subject to reversion if it is modified in a way that is inconsistent with the Forest Legacy Program or the State's assessment of need.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Environment Energy And Infrastructure
- Improves Environmental Protections+5Improves Public Land Management+5
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+6Increases Federal Power-2
- 4/6/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 12/1/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 7/10/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 6/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/29/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2025
- Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR E303)
- Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
- 5 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Suzanne BonamiciDemocrat · Oregon
Ken CalvertRepublican · California
Jim CostaDemocrat · California
Brian FitzpatrickRepublican · Pennsylvania
Adam GrayDemocrat · California
Josh HarderDemocrat · California
Kevin MullinDemocrat · California
Josh RileyDemocrat · New York
Andrea SalinasDemocrat · Oregon
Jill TokudaDemocrat · Hawaii
George WhitesidesDemocrat · California