Bill · H.R. 2691· House(119-HR-2691)
To abolish the Department of Education and to provide funding directly to States for elementary and secondary education, and for other purposes.
- Introduced
- 4/7/2025
- Last activity
- 4/7/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- Sponsored by
- Barry Moore
- Cosponsors
- - 5 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill proposes to abolish the Department of Education and terminate each applicable program within 30 days of enactment. The Federal Pell Grant program and the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program would not be considered applicable programs. Instead, the authority to carry out those remaining programs would transfer to the Secretary of the Treasury. Additionally, the bill establishes an Elementary and Secondary Education Grant Program. Under this program, the Secretary of the Treasury would make allocations to States to support elementary and secondary education. These allocations would be based on the proportion of Federal individual income taxes paid by a State's residents relative to the total paid by all States.
Yes
Does this leave more decisions to the states?+7
The bill transfers educational authority and funding control directly to the states.
Does this make it easier to use public money at a school other than the local one?+5
The bill expresses a sense of Congress that states should promote competition and choice in education.
Would high-income households be better off under this?+3
The funding formula likely benefits states with higher aggregate income tax contributions, which often correlates with higher-income residents.
The opposite· 3 of 5
Does this give the federal government more power?-5
The bill significantly decreases federal power by abolishing the Department of Education and transferring fund management to the Treasury.
Does this reduce what the federal government spends?-3
The abolishment of a major federal department likely leads to significant reductions in federal spending.
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?-3
The new funding formula based on state income tax contributions may reduce resources available to low-income states.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Transfer of Student Aid Oversight: The authority for the Federal Pell Grant program and the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program would be transferred to the Secretary of the Treasury, ensuring these specific programs continue (Section 1(b) and 1(c)).
-
Direct Support for State Education: States would receive allocations from the Secretary of the Treasury to support elementary and secondary education (Section 2(b)).
-
Promoting Competition and Choice: The bill expresses the sense of Congress that States should distribute non-Federal funds to promote competition and choices in education to secure the best education for each child (Section 2(a)(1)).
-
Parental Rights: The bill expresses the sense of Congress that it is a fundamental right of parents to determine the best education for their children (Section 2(a)(2)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
-
Abolishment of the Department of Education: The Department of Education would be abolished and each applicable program would be terminated within 30 days of the Act's enactment (Section 1(a)).
-
Changes to Funding Distribution: Funding for elementary and secondary education would move to a system of allocations to States based on the aggregate amount of Federal individual income taxes paid by residents of that State (Section 2(c)).
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Economy And Finance
- Reduces Government Spending-3
- Education And Technology
- Improves School Choice+5Increases Public School Funding-2
- Governance And Ideology
- Increase States Rights+7Increases Federal Power-5
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Racial Equity-2
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For High Income Households+3Good For Low Income Households-3
- 5/19/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/4/2026
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/7/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- 3 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Elijah CraneRepublican · Arizona
Brandon GillRepublican · Texas
John McGuireRepublican · Virginia
Ralph NormanRepublican · South Carolina
Joe WilsonRepublican · South Carolina