Bill · H.R. 2476· House(119-HR-2476)
Stop Illegal Campaign Coordination Act
- Introduced
- 3/27/2025
- Last activity
- 3/27/2025 — Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
- Sponsored by
- Jill Tokuda
- Cosponsors
- - 4 - 0
- Introduced
- In Committee
What this bill would do
This bill, known as the "Stop Illegal Campaign Coordination Act," aims to amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. It seeks to change how certain expenditures are treated regarding coordination with candidates or political party committees. Under this Act, an expenditure is considered coordinated if it is materially consistent with instructions, directions, guidance, or suggestions from a candidate or committee. This applies even if those communications are not public or are shared indirectly. The bill also provides specific factors for the Commission to use when determining if such consistency exists.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
-
Clarification of Coordinated Expenditures: By adding paragraph (10)(A) to Section 315(a), the bill establishes that expenditures are coordinated if they are materially consistent with instructions, directions, guidance, or suggestions from a candidate or committee. This could provide clearer rules on what constitutes coordination regardless of whether the communications are public or private.
-
Standardized Factors for Determination: Section 2(a)(3)(B) provides a specific list of factors for the Commission to consider when determining if an expenditure is materially consistent. These factors include:
- Whether instructions indicate information should be sent to specific voters (Section 2(a)(3)(B)(C)(i)).
- Whether instructions include details about target audiences, such as demographics or location (Section 2(a)(3)(B)(C)(ii)).
- Whether instructions suggest specific methods of communication, such as social media or direct mail (Section 2(a)(3)(B)(C)(iii)).
- Whether specific phrases, images, or audio are used in the resulting communication (Section 2(a)(3)(B)(C)(iv)).
- Whether instructions are set apart using a specific signal or cue (Section 2(a)(3)(B)(C)(v)).
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Presumption of Coordination: Under Section 2(a)(3)(B), if the Commission determines that one or more of the listed factors apply, the expenditure shall be presumed to be materially consistent with instructions. This creates a legal presumption of coordination based on the identified factors.
- 3/27/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
- 4 Cosponsors added.
- Introduced in House
Becca BalintDemocrat · Vermont
Ed CaseDemocrat · Hawaii
Pramila JayapalDemocrat · Washington
Paul TonkoDemocrat · New York