Bill · H.R. 2312· House(119-HR-2312)
Tipped Employee Protection Act
- Introduced
- 3/24/2025
- Last activity
- 1/13/2026 — POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on H.R. 2312 is postponed.
- Sponsored by
- Steve Womack
- Cosponsors
- - 6 - 0
- Introduced
What this bill would do
This bill is known as the Tipped Employee Protection Act. It amends the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938. The legislation revises the definition of the term tipped employee. It changes how tips and cash wages are factored into a work period determined by the employer. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives by Mr. Womack and has additional sponsors. It was reported with an amendment and ordered to be printed.
Yes· 3 of 4
Would households on low incomes be better off under this?+4
Ensuring minimum wage for tipped employees will likely benefit low-income households.
Does this raise the lowest wage an employer may pay?+3
The bill ensures tipped employees receive at least the minimum wage when tips and cash wages are combined.
Is this likely to lift people out of poverty?+2
The bill may help in poverty reduction by potentially increasing earnings for tipped employees.
The opposite
Would business owners be better off under this?-1
The employer is impacted negatively due to the requirements.
Does this make it easier to run a small business?-1
The flexibility in choosing calculation periods could potentially lead to instability for tipped employees.
What Congress actually voted on
One recorded vote has been taken on this bill.
None of them settled the bill — every vote so far has been about whether to keep going.
Who it would affect, and how
Potential Positive Impacts for People
- Section 2 allows employers to determine the work period used for evaluating employee tips and cash wages, which includes options such as 1 day, 1 week, every 2 weeks, every 28 days, or every pay period. This provision provides specific timeframes that employers can use.
Potential Negative Impacts for People
- Based on the provided text, there are no explicit negative impacts or burdens identified for individuals or groups of people.
Groups and Interests Ranking
Every group the model scored this bill for, from -10 to +10. Hover a score for the reason it gave.
- Demographic And Interest Groups
- Good For Low Income Households+4Good For Young Adults+1Good For Business Owners-1
- Economy And Finance
- Increases Minimum Wage+3Improves Small Business Support-1
- Social Issues And Justice
- Improves Poverty Reduction+2
| Updated | Bill | Title | Policy Area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 months ago | On agreeing to the Rules amendment (A001) Agreed to without objection. |
- 1/13/2026
- POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - Pursuant to clause 1(c) of rule XIX, the Chair announced that further proceedings on H.R. 2312 is postponed.
- On motion to recommit Failed by the Yeas and Nays: 209 - 215 (Roll no. 21).
- Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H694)
- POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 2312, the Chair put the question on motion to recommit and by voice vote, announced the noes had prevailed. Ms. Budzinski demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
- The previous question on the motion to recommit was ordered pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XIX.
- Ms. Budzinski moved to recommit to the Committee on Education and Workforce. (text: CR H690-691)
- The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
- DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 2312.
- Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2988, H.R. 2262, H.R. 2270, H.R. 2312 and H.R. 4366. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2988 under a structured rule, and H.R. 2262, H.R. 2270, H.R. 2312, and H.R. 4366 under a closed rule. The rule provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
- Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 988. (consideration: CR H685-691; text of amendment in the nature of a substitute: CR H685)
- 1/12/2026
- Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 988 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 2988, H.R. 2262, H.R. 2270, H.R. 2312 and H.R. 4366. The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 2988 under a structured rule, and H.R. 2262, H.R. 2270, H.R. 2312, and H.R. 4366 under a closed rule. The rule provides for one hour of general debate and one motion to recommit on each bill.
- 12/30/2025
- Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Education and Workforce. H. Rept. 119-420.
- Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 366.
- 11/20/2025
- Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held
- Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 19 - 15.
- 11/17/2025
- 2 Cosponsors added.
- 11/7/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/21/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 10/17/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 4/9/2025
- 1 Cosponsor added.
- 3/24/2025
- Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
- Introduced in House
One bill Congress.gov lists as related to this one — companions in the other chamber, earlier versions, and bills this one absorbed or was folded into.
Michael BaumgartnerRepublican · Washington
Glenn GrothmanRepublican · Wisconsin
Julia LetlowRepublican · Louisiana
Mark MessmerRepublican · Indiana
Pete SessionsRepublican · Texas
Bruce WestermanRepublican · Arkansas